Understanding Perception of Human Augmentation: A Mixed-Method Study
Steeven Villa, Jasmin Niess, Takuro Nakao, Jonathan Lazar, Albrecht Schmidt, Tonja-Katrin Machulla
Abstract
Technologies that help users overcome their limitations and integrate with the human body are often termed “human augmentations”. Such technologies are now available on the consumer market, potentially supporting people in their everyday activities. To date, there is no systematic understanding of the perception of human augmentations yet. To address this gap and build an understanding of how to design positive experiences with human augmentations, we conducted a mixed-method study of the perception of augmented humans (AHs). We conducted two scenario-based studies: interviews (n = 16) and an online study (n = 506) with participants from four countries. The scenarios include one out of three augmentation categories (sensory, motor, and cognitive) and specify if the augmented person has a disability or not. Overall, results show that the type of augmentation and disability impacted user attitudes towards AHs. We derive design dimensions for creating technological augmentations for a diverse and global audience.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2533db75-e577-4829-bd62-dcbf325da927Cited by top-tier papers3
- A Design Space for Vision Augmentations and Augmented Human Perception using Digital EyewearTobias Langlotz, Jonathan Sutton, Holger RegenbrechtCHI 2024 · 12 citations
- Society's Attitudes Towards Human Augmentation and Performance Enhancement Technologies (SHAPE) ScaleSteeven Villa, Jasmin Niess, Albrecht Schmidt, Robin WelschUbiComp 2023 · 11 citations
- The Nuances of Creepiness: A Systematic Literature Review of Creepy TechnologyTora Jarsve, Barbara Sienkiewicz, Meagan B. Loerakker, Pawel W. Wozniak et al.CHI 2026 · 4 citations
Builds on5
- How WEIRD is CHI?Sebastian Linxen, Christian Sturm, Florian Brühlmann, Vincent Cassau et al.CHI 2021 · 254 citations
- Next Steps for Human-Computer IntegrationFlorian 'Floyd' Mueller, Pedro Lopes, Paul Strohmeier, Wendy Ju et al.CHI 2020 · 252 citations
- Social Acceptability in HCI: A Survey of Methods, Measures, and Design StrategiesMarion Koelle, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Susanne BollCHI 2020 · 174 citations
- Next Steps in Epidermal Computing: Opportunities and Challenges for Soft On-Skin DevicesAditya Shekhar Nittala, Jürgen SteimleCHI 2022 · 32 citations
- Understanding People's Perceptions of Approaches to Semi-Automated Dietary MonitoringXi Lu, Edison Thomaz, Daniel A. EpsteinUbiComp 2022 · 18 citations
Related papers
- Understanding User Acceptance of Electrical Muscle Stimulation in Human-Computer InteractionSarah Faltaous, Julie R. Williamson, Marion Koelle, Max Pfeiffer et al.CHI 2024 · 10 citations
- Exclusion Rates among Disabled and Older Users of Virtual and Augmented RealityRosella P. Galindo Esparza, John J. Dudley, Vanja Garaj, Per Ola KristenssonCHI 2025 · 4 citations
- Understanding Public Perceptions of AI Conversational Agents: A Cross-Cultural AnalysisZihan Liu, Han Li, Anfan Chen, Renwen Zhang et al.CHI 2024 · 55 citations
- Delivering the Future: Understanding User Perceptions of Delivery RobotsHyorim Shin, Junho Choi, Changhoon OhCSCW 2024 · 14 citations
- One AI Does Not Fit All: A Cluster Analysis of the Laypeople's Perception of AI RolesTaenyun Kim, Maria D. Molina, Minjin Rheu, Emily Shuo Zhan et al.CHI 2023 · 67 citations
