Society's Attitudes Towards Human Augmentation and Performance Enhancement Technologies (SHAPE) Scale
Steeven Villa, Jasmin Niess, Albrecht Schmidt, Robin Welsch
Abstract
Human augmentation technologies (ATs) are a subset of ubiquitous on-body devices designed to improve cognitive, sensory, and motor capacities. Although there is a large corpus of knowledge concerning ATs, less is known about societal attitudes towards them and how they shift over time. To that end, we developed The Society's Attitudes Towards Human Augmentation and Performance Enhancement Technologies (SHAPE) Scale, which measures how users of ATs are perceived. To develop the scale, we first created a list of possible scale items based on past work on how people respond to new technologies. The items were then reviewed by experts. Next, we performed exploratory factor analysis to reduce the scale to its final length of thirteen items. Subsequently, we confirmed test-retest validity of our instrument, as well as its construct validity. The SHAPE scale enables researchers and practitioners to understand elements contributing to attitudes toward augmentation technology users. The SHAPE scale assists designers of ATs in designing artifacts that will be more universally accepted.
• Human-centered computing → Ubiquitous computing; Ubiquitous and mobile computing design and evaluation methods; HCI design and evaluation methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1e930725-d96c-4267-931f-276043a2cd89Cited by top-tier papers3
- Assessing User Apprehensions About Mixed Reality Artifacts and Applications: The Mixed Reality Concerns (MRC) QuestionnaireChristopher Katins, Pawel W. Wozniak, Aodi Chen, Ihsan Tumay et al.CHI 2024 · 15 citations
- The Nuances of Creepiness: A Systematic Literature Review of Creepy TechnologyTora Jarsve, Barbara Sienkiewicz, Meagan B. Loerakker, Pawel W. Wozniak et al.CHI 2026 · 4 citations
- How I Use My Body: The Bodily Feedback Quality ScaleBettina Eska, Meagan B. Loerakker, Jasmin Niess, Pawel W. WozniakUbiComp 2026
Builds on10
- Next Steps for Human-Computer IntegrationFlorian 'Floyd' Mueller, Pedro Lopes, Paul Strohmeier, Wendy Ju et al.CHI 2020 · 252 citations
- Social Acceptability in HCI: A Survey of Methods, Measures, and Design StrategiesMarion Koelle, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Susanne BollCHI 2020 · 174 citations
- How does HCI Understand Human Agency and Autonomy?Dan Bennett, Oussama Metatla, Anne Roudaut, Elisa D. MeklerCHI 2023 · 107 citations
- Creepy Technology: What Is It and How Do You Measure It?Pawel W. Wozniak, Jakob Karolus, Florian Lang, Caroline Eckerth et al.CHI 2021 · 84 citations
- The Development and Validation of the Technology-Supported Reflection InventoryMarit Bentvelzen, Jasmin Niess, Mikolaj P. Wozniak, Pawel W. WozniakCHI 2021 · 68 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Perception of Human Augmentation: A Mixed-Method StudySteeven Villa, Jasmin Niess, Takuro Nakao, Jonathan Lazar et al.CHI 2023 · 22 citations
- Creepy Assistant: Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure the Perceived Creepiness of Voice AssistantsRachel Phinnemore, Mohi Reza, Blaine Lewis, Karthik Mahadevan et al.CHI 2023 · 17 citations
- Perceived Empathy of Technology Scale (PETS): Measuring Empathy of Systems Toward the UserMatthias Schmidmaier, Jonathan Rupp, Darina Cvetanova, Sven MayerCHI 2024 · 45 citations
- Transhuman Communication: Human Augmentation Technologies through Co-Speculation WorkshopsÇaglar Genç, Velvet Spors, Oguz 'Oz' Buruk, Mattia Thibault et al.CSCW 2024 · 6 citations
- Developing and Validating the Perceived System Curiosity Scale (PSC): Measuring Users' Perceived Curiosity of SystemsJan Leusmann, Steeven Villa, Burak Berberoglu, Chao Wang et al.CHI 2025 · 9 citations
