Attention Please: Your Attention Check Questions in Survey Studies Can Be Automatically Answered
Weiping Pei, Arthur Mayer, Kaylynn Tu, Chuan Yue
Abstract
Attention check questions have become commonly used in online surveys published on popular crowdsourcing platforms as a key mechanism to filter out inattentive respondents and improve data quality. However, little research considers the vulnerabilities of this important quality control mechanism that can allow attackers including irresponsible and malicious respondents to automatically answer attention check questions for efficiently achieving their goals. In this paper, we perform the first study to investigate such vulnerabilities, and demonstrate that attackers can leverage deep learning techniques to pass attention check questions automatically. We propose AC-EasyPass, an attack framework with a concrete model, that combines convolutional neural network and weighted feature reconstruction to easily pass attention check questions. We construct the first attention check question dataset that consists of both original and augmented questions, and demonstrate the effectiveness of AC-EasyPass. We explore two simple defense methods, adding adversarial sentences and adding typos, for survey designers to mitigate the risks posed by AC-EasyPass; however, these methods are fragile due to their limitations from both technical and usability perspectives, underlining the challenging nature of defense. We hope our work will raise sufficient attention of the research community towards developing more robust attention check mechanisms. More broadly, our work intends to prompt the research community to seriously consider the emerging risks posed by the malicious use of machine learning techniques to the quality, validity, and trustworthiness of crowdsourcing and social computing.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 22b8e148-38ef-4bcd-b052-9c2826c7a2aeCited by top-tier papers3
- If in a Crowdsourced Data Annotation Pipeline, a GPT-4Zeyu He, Chieh-Yang Huang, Chien-Kuang Cornelia Ding, Shaurya Rohatgi et al.CHI 2024 · 31 citations
- Designing Value-Centered Consent Interfaces: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Support Patient Values in Data-Sharing DecisionsDavid Leimstädtner, Peter Sörries, Claudia Müller-BirnCSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- Wisdom of the Crowd, Without the Crowd: A Socratic LLM for Asynchronous Deliberation on Perspectivist DataMalik Khadar, Daniel Runningen, Julia Tang, Stevie Chancellor et al.CSCW 2025 · 2 citations
Related papers
- Text Captcha Is Dead? A Large Scale Deployment and Empirical StudyChenghui Shi, Shouling Ji, Qianjun Liu, Changchang Liu et al.CCS 2020 · 22 citations
- EaTVul: ChatGPT-based Evasion Attack Against Software Vulnerability DetectionShigang Liu, Di Cao, Junae Kim, Tamas Abraham et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 13 citations
- Double Face: Leveraging User Intelligence to Characterize and Recognize AI-synthesized FacesMatthew Joslin, Xian Wang, Shuang HaoUSENIX Security 2024 · 4 citations
- Automated Crowdturfing Attacks and Defenses in Online Review SystemsYuanshun Yao, Bimal Viswanath, Jenna Cryan, Haitao Zheng et al.CCS 2017 · 169 citations
- Safeguarding Crowdsourcing Surveys from ChatGPT through Prompt InjectionChaofan Wang, Samuel Kernan Freire, Mo Zhang, Jing Wei et al.CSCW 2025 · 1 citation
