Automated Crowdturfing Attacks and Defenses in Online Review Systems
Yuanshun Yao, Bimal Viswanath, Jenna Cryan, Haitao Zheng, Ben Y. Zhao
Abstract
Malicious crowdsourcing forums are gaining traction as sources of spreading misinformation online, but are limited by the costs of hiring and managing human workers. In this paper, we identify a new class of attacks that leverage deep learning language models (Recurrent Neural Networks or RNNs) to automate the generation of fake online reviews for products and services. Not only are these attacks cheap and therefore more scalable, but they can control rate of content output to eliminate the signature burstiness that makes crowdsourced campaigns easy to detect. Using Yelp reviews as an example platform, we show how a two phased review generation and customization attack can produce reviews that are indistinguishable by state-of-the-art statistical detectors. We conduct a survey-based user study to show these reviews not only evade human detection, but also score high on "usefulness" metrics by users. Finally, we develop novel automated defenses against these attacks, by leveraging the lossy transformation introduced by the RNN training and generation cycle. We consider countermeasures against our mechanisms, show that they produce unattractive cost-benefit tradeoffs for attackers, and that they can be further curtailed by simple constraints imposed by online service providers. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Social aspects of security and privacy; • Computing methodologies → Natural language generation; Neural networks;
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ce1145c4-091c-4a01-a9b9-49709f4dda69Cited by top-tier papers16
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
- Robust Spammer Detection by Nash Reinforcement LearningYingtong Dou, Guixiang Ma, Philip S. Yu, Sihong XieKDD 2020 · 59 citations
- Dangerous Skills Got Certified: Measuring the Trustworthiness of Skill Certification in Voice Personal Assistant PlatformsLong Cheng, Christin Wilson, Song Liao, Jeffrey Young et al.CCS 2020 · 58 citations
- Smoke Screener or Straight Shooter: Detecting Elite Sybil Attacks in User-Review Social NetworksHaizhong Zheng, Minhui Xue, Hao Lu, Shuang Hao et al.NDSS 2018 · 57 citations
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Deepfake Text Detection: Limitations and OpportunitiesJiameng Pu, Zain Sarwar, Sifat Muhammad Abdullah, Abdullah Rehman et al.S&P 2023
- Shilling Black-box Review-based Recommender Systems through Fake Review GenerationHung-Yun Chiang, Yi-Syuan Chen, Yun-Zhu Song, Hong-Han Shuai et al.KDD 2023 · 15 citations
- Double Face: Leveraging User Intelligence to Characterize and Recognize AI-synthesized FacesMatthew Joslin, Xian Wang, Shuang HaoUSENIX Security 2024 · 4 citations
- Attention Please: Your Attention Check Questions in Survey Studies Can Be Automatically AnsweredWeiping Pei, Arthur Mayer, Kaylynn Tu, Chuan YueWWW 2020 · 37 citations
- Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is PracticalNicholas Carlini, Matthew Jagielski, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Daniel Paleka et al.S&P 2024 · 309 citations
