Designing Value-Centered Consent Interfaces: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Support Patient Values in Data-Sharing Decisions
David Leimstädtner, Peter Sörries, Claudia Müller-Birn
Abstract
In the digital health domain, ethical data collection practices are crucial for ensuring the availability of quality datasets that drive medical advancement. Data donation, allowing patients to share their medical data for secondary research purposes, presents a promising resource for such datasets. Yet, current consent user interfaces mediating data-sharing decisions are found to favor data collectors' values over those of data subjects. Seeking to establish value-centered data collection practices in digital health, we investigate the design of consent user interfaces that support end-users in making value-congruent health data-sharing decisions. Focusing our research efforts on the situated context of health data donation at the psychosomatic unit of a university hospital, we demonstrate how a human-centered design can ground technology within the perspective of a vulnerable group. We employed an exploratory sequential mixed-method approach consisting of five phases: (1) Participatory workshops elicit patient values, informing the (2) design of a proposed Value-Centered Consent Interface. An (3) online experiment demonstrates our interface element's effect, increasing value congruence in data-sharing decisions. Our proposed consent user interface design is then adapted to the research context through a (4) co-creation workshop with domain experts and (5) a user interface evaluation with patients. Our work contributes to recent discourse in CSCW concerning ethical implications of new data practices within their socio-technological context by exploring patient values on medical data-sharing, introducing a novel consent interface leveraging reflection to support value-congruent decision-making, and providing a situated evaluation of the proposed consent user interface with patients. CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing; • Security and privacy → Social aspects of security and privacy; • Applied computing → Health care information systems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2e307998-319e-471d-8e2b-1e1fe219f2dbBuilds on23
- To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-makingZana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, Krzysztof Z. GajosCSCW 2021 · 962 citations
- Dark Patterns after the GDPR: Scraping Consent Pop-ups and Demonstrating their InfluenceMidas Nouwens, Ilaria Liccardi, Michael Veale, David R. Karger et al.CHI 2020 · 491 citations
- (Un)informed Consent: Studying GDPR Consent Notices in the FieldChristine Utz, Martin Degeling, Sascha Fahl, Florian Schaub et al.CCS 2019 · 429 citations
- How Well Do My Results Generalize? Comparing Security and Privacy Survey Results from MTurk, Web, and Telephone SamplesElissa M. Redmiles, Sean Kross, Michelle L. MazurekS&P 2019 · 222 citations
- Do Datasets Have Politics? Disciplinary Values in Computer Vision Dataset DevelopmentMorgan Klaus Scheuerman, Alex Hanna, Emily DentonCSCW 2021 · 169 citations
Related papers
- Advocating Values through Meaningful Participation: Introducing a Method to Elicit and Analyze Values for Enriching Data Donation Practices in HealthcarePeter Sörries, David Leimstädtner, Claudia Müller-BirnCSCW 2024 · 7 citations
- Missed Opportunities for Human-Centered AI Research: Understanding Stakeholder Collaboration in Mental Health AI ResearchDong Whi Yoo, Hayoung Woo, Sachin R. Pendse, Nathaniel Young Lu et al.CSCW 2024 · 22 citations
- Exploring the Future of Informed Consent: Applying a Service Design ApproachBrian James McInnis, Ramona Pindus, Daniah Kareem, Savannah Gamboa et al.CSCW 2024 · 17 citations
- We Need Granular Sharing of De-Identified Data - But Will Patients Engage? Investigating Health System Leaders' and Patients' Perspectives on A Patient-Controlled Data-Sharing Platform CSCW043Xi Lu, Di Hu, An T. Nguyen, Brad Morse et al.CSCW 2026
- Tensions and Mitigations: Understanding Concerns and Values around Smartphone Data Collection for Public Health EmergenciesColin Watson, Ridita Ali, Jan David SmeddinckCSCW 2021 · 6 citations
