Lune

ACL Findings2021

How Reliable are Model Diagnostics?

Vamsi Aribandi, Yi Tay, Donald Metzler

Abstract

In the pursuit of a deeper understanding of a model's behaviour, there is recent impetus for developing suites of probes aimed at diagnosing models beyond simple metrics like accuracy or BLEU. This paper takes a step back and asks an important and timely question: how reliable are these diagnostics in providing insight into models and training setups? We critically examine three recent diagnostic tests for pre-trained language models, and find that likelihood-based and representation-based model diagnostics are not yet as reliable as previously assumed. Based on our empirical findings, we also formulate recommendations for practitioners and researchers.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 6 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers6

  1. An Empirical Survey of the Effectiveness of Debiasing Techniques for Pre-trained Language ModelsNicholas Meade, Elinor Poole-Dayan, Siva ReddyACL 2022 · 160 citations
  2. The MultiBERTs: BERT Reproductions for Robustness AnalysisThibault Sellam, Steve Yadlowsky, Ian Tenney, Jason Wei et al.ICLR 2022 · 106 citations
  3. An Empirical Analysis of Parameter-Efficient Methods for Debiasing Pre-Trained Language ModelsZhongbin Xie, Thomas LukasiewiczACL 2023 · 22 citations
  4. MABEL: Attenuating Gender Bias using Textual Entailment DataJacqueline He, Mengzhou Xia, Christiane Fellbaum, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2022 · 15 citations
  5. A Comparative Study on the Impact of Model Compression Techniques on Fairness in Language ModelsKrithika Ramesh, Arnav Chavan, Shrey Pandit, Sunayana SitaramACL 2023 · 14 citations

Builds on6

  1. Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP Models with CheckListMarco Túlio Ribeiro, Tongshuang Wu, Carlos Guestrin, Sameer SinghACL 2020 · 51 citations
  2. Gradient-based Analysis of NLP Models is ManipulableJunlin Wang, Jens Tuyls, Eric Wallace, Sameer SinghEMNLP Findings 2020 · 43 citations
  3. Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description LengthElena Voita, Ivan TitovEMNLP 2020 · 34 citations
  4. CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language ModelsNikita Nangia, Clara Vania, Rasika Bhalerao, Samuel R. BowmanEMNLP 2020 · 19 citations
  5. Learning to Deceive with Attention-Based ExplanationsDanish Pruthi, Mansi Gupta, Bhuwan Dhingra, Graham Neubig et al.ACL 2020 · 17 citations

Related papers

  1. Predicting Fine-Tuning Performance with ProbingZining Zhu, Soroosh Shahtalebi, Frank RudziczEMNLP 2022 · 6 citations
  2. Can Prompt Probe Pretrained Language Models? Understanding the Invisible Risks from a Causal ViewBoxi Cao, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Fangchao Liu et al.ACL 2022
  3. On the data requirements of probingZining Zhu, Jixuan Wang, Bai Li, Frank RudziczACL Findings 2022 · 4 citations
  4. Adjective Scale Probe: Can Language Models Encode Formal Semantics Information?Wei Liu, Ming Xiang, Nai DingAAAI 2023 · 7 citations
  5. Rethinking RL Evaluation: Can Benchmarks Truly Reveal Failures of RL Methods?Zihan Chen, Yiming Zhang, Hengguang Zhou, Zenghui Ding et al.ACL Findings 2026
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines