Predicting Fine-Tuning Performance with Probing
Zining Zhu, Soroosh Shahtalebi, Frank Rudzicz
Abstract
Large NLP models have recently shown impressive performance in language understanding tasks, typically evaluated by their fine-tuned performance. Alternatively, probing has received increasing attention as being a lightweight method for interpreting the intrinsic mechanisms of large NLP models. In probing, post-hoc classifiers are trained on “out-of-domain” datasets that diagnose specific abilities. While probing the language models has led to insightful findings, they appear disjointed from the development of models. This paper explores the utility of probing deep NLP models to extract a proxy signal widely used in model development – the fine-tuning performance. We find that it is possible to use the accuracies of only three probing tests to predict the fine-tuning performance with errors 40% - 80% smaller than baselines. We further discuss possible avenues where probing can empower the development of deep NLP models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cb40c7fc-5fd5-4d92-a7b6-1617966bba9cCited by top-tier papers5
- Beyond Token Probes: Hallucination Detection via Activation Tensors with ACT-ViTGuy Bar-Shalom, Fabrizio Frasca, Yaniv Galron, Yftah Ziser et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- Pixology: Probing the Linguistic and Visual Capabilities of Pixel-based Language ModelsKushal Tatariya, Vladimir Araujo, Thomas Bauwens, Miryam de LhoneuxEMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- Evolving Prompts In-Context: An Open-ended, Self-replicating PerspectiveJianyu Wang, Zhiqiang Hu, Lidong BingICML 2025
- TuneAhead: Predicting Fine-tuning Performance Before Training BeginsYuxiang Luo, Haonan Long, Chen Wang, Qiqi Duan et al.ICML 2026
- A Risk Decomposition Framework for Pre-hoc Fine-tuning PredictionYuxiang Luo, Chen Wang, Nan TangICML 2026
Builds on20
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel et al.ICLR 2020 · 7,418 citations
- Deberta: decoding-Enhanced Bert with Disentangled AttentionPengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu ChenICLR 2021 · 3,729 citations
- Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer LearningJunxian He, Chunting Zhou, Xuezhe Ma, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick et al.ICLR 2022 · 1,182 citations
- Climbing towards NLU: On Meaning, Form, and Understanding in the Age of DataEmily M. Bender, Alexander KollerACL 2020 · 914 citations
Related papers
- Mechanisms vs. Outcomes: Probing for Syntax Fails to Explain Performance on Targeted Syntactic EvaluationsAnanth Agarwal, Jasper Jian, Christopher D. Manning, Shikhar MurtyEMNLP 2025 · 5 citations
- Improving Preference Extraction In LLMs By Identifying Latent Knowledge Through Classifying ProbesSharan Maiya, Yinhong Liu, Ramit Debnath, Anna KorhonenACL 2025 · 4 citations
- Intermediate-Task Transfer Learning with Pretrained Language Models: When and Why Does It Work?Yada Pruksachatkun, Jason Phang, Haokun Liu, Phu Mon Htut et al.ACL 2020 · 168 citations
- Prompting is not a substitute for probability measurements in large language modelsJennifer Hu, Roger LevyEMNLP 2023 · 31 citations
- Can Prompt Probe Pretrained Language Models? Understanding the Invisible Risks from a Causal ViewBoxi Cao, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Fangchao Liu et al.ACL 2022
