EMNLP Findings2020
On the Interplay Between Fine-tuning and Sentence-Level Probing for Linguistic Knowledge in Pre-Trained Transformers
Marius Mosbach, Anna Khokhlova, Michael A. Hedderich, Dietrich Klakow
Abstract
Fine-tuning pre-trained contextualized embedding models has become an integral part of the NLP pipeline. At the same time, probing has emerged as a way to investigate the linguistic knowledge captured by pre-trained models. Very little is, however, understood about how fine-tuning affects the representations of pre-trained models and thereby the linguistic knowledge they encode. This paper contributes towards closing this gap. We study three different pre-trained models: BERT, RoBERTa, and ALBERT, and investigate through sentence-level probing how finetuning affects their representations. We find that for some probing tasks fine-tuning leads to substantial changes in accuracy, possibly suggesting that fine-tuning introduces or even removes linguistic knowledge from a pre-trained model. These changes, however, vary greatly across different models, fine-tuning and probing tasks. Our analysis reveals that while finetuning indeed changes the representations of a pre-trained model and these changes are typically larger for higher layers, only in very few cases, fine-tuning has a positive effect on probing accuracy that is larger than just using the pre-trained model with a strong pooling method. Based on our findings, we argue that both positive and negative effects of finetuning on probing require a careful interpretation.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 14 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers14
- A Closer Look at How Fine-tuning Changes BERTYichu Zhou, Vivek SrikumarACL 2022 · 84 citations
- Vision-Language Model Fine-Tuning via Simple Parameter-Efficient ModificationMing Li, Jike Zhong, Chenxin Li, Liuzhuozheng Li et al.EMNLP 2024 · 18 citations
- Superficial Self-Improved Reasoners Benefit from Model MergingXiangchi Yuan, Chunhui Zhang, Zheyuan Liu, Dachuan Shi et al.EMNLP 2025 · 15 citations
- Training language models to summarize narratives improves brain alignmentKhai Loong Aw, Mariya TonevaICLR 2023 · 11 citations
- Where to start? Analyzing the potential value of intermediate modelsLeshem Choshen, Elad Venezian, Shachar Don-Yehiya, Noam Slonim et al.EMNLP 2023 · 7 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- How transfer learning impacts linguistic knowledge in deep NLP models?Nadir Durrani, Hassan Sajjad, Fahim DalviACL Findings 2021 · 39 citations
- A matter of framing: The impact of linguistic formalism on probing resultsIlia Kuznetsov, Iryna GurevychEMNLP 2020 · 1 citation
- Intermediate-Task Transfer Learning with Pretrained Language Models: When and Why Does It Work?Yada Pruksachatkun, Jason Phang, Haokun Liu, Phu Mon Htut et al.ACL 2020 · 168 citations
- Compositional and Lexical Semantics in RoBERTa, BERT and DistilBERT: A Case Study on CoQAIeva Staliunaite, Ignacio IacobacciEMNLP 2020 · 2 citations
- On the Importance of Data Size in Probing Fine-tuned ModelsHouman Mehrafarin, Sara Rajaee, Mohammad Taher PilehvarACL Findings 2022 · 12 citations
