Where to start? Analyzing the potential value of intermediate models
Leshem Choshen, Elad Venezian, Shachar Don-Yehiya, Noam Slonim, Yoav Katz
Abstract
Previous studies observed that finetuned models may be better base models than the vanilla pretrained model. Such a model, finetuned on some source dataset, may provide a better starting point for a new finetuning process on a desired target dataset. Here, we perform a systematic analysis of this intertraining scheme, over a wide range of English classification tasks. Surprisingly, our analysis suggests that the potential intertraining gain can be analyzed independently for the target dataset under consideration, and for a base model being considered as a starting point. Hence, a performant model is generally strong, even if its training data was not aligned with the target dataset. Furthermore, we leverage our analysis to propose a practical and efficient approach to determine if and how to select a base model in real-world settings. Last, we release an updating ranking of best models in the HuggingFace hub per architecture. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 35b60b7c-3832-48a0-8861-bbbb53891a03Cited by top-tier papers7
- Model Ratatouille: Recycling Diverse Models for Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationAlexandre Ramé, Kartik Ahuja, Jianyu Zhang, Matthieu Cord et al.ICML 2023 · 108 citations
- Git-Theta: A Git Extension for Collaborative Development of Machine Learning ModelsNikhil Kandpal, Brian Lester, Mohammed Muqeeth, Anisha Mascarenhas et al.ICML 2023 · 15 citations
- Local Superior Soups: A Catalyst for Model Merging in Cross-Silo Federated LearningMinghui Chen, Meirui Jiang, Xin Zhang, Qi Dou et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- QAID: Question Answering Inspired Few-shot Intent DetectionAsaf Yehudai, Matan Vetzler, Yosi Mass, Koren Lazar et al.ICLR 2023 · 1 citation
- Compress then Serve: Serving Thousands of LoRA Adapters with Little OverheadRickard Brüel Gabrielsson, Jiacheng Zhu, Onkar Bhardwaj, Leshem Choshen et al.ICML 2025
Builds on18
- PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive SummarizationJingqing Zhang, Yao Zhao, Mohammad Saleh, Peter J. LiuICML 2020 · 2,453 citations
- Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timeMitchell Wortsman, Gabriel Ilharco, Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Rebecca Roelofs et al.ICML 2022 · 1,464 citations
- Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-DistributionAnanya Kumar, Aditi Raghunathan, Robbie Matthew Jones, Tengyu Ma et al.ICLR 2022 · 911 citations
- Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted AveragingMichael Matena, Colin RaffelNeurIPS 2022 · 741 citations
- Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language UnderstandingYixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal et al.ACL 2020 · 602 citations
Related papers
- Intermediate-Task Transfer Learning with Pretrained Language Models: When and Why Does It Work?Yada Pruksachatkun, Jason Phang, Haokun Liu, Phu Mon Htut et al.ACL 2020 · 168 citations
- Cluster & Tune: Boost Cold Start Performance in Text ClassificationEyal Shnarch, Ariel Gera, Alon Halfon, Lena Dankin et al.ACL 2022 · 27 citations
- Revisiting Machine Translation for Cross-lingual ClassificationMikel Artetxe, Vedanuj Goswami, Shruti Bhosale, Angela Fan et al.EMNLP 2023 · 10 citations
- Fine-Tuning is Fine, if CalibratedZheda Mai, Arpita Chowdhury, Ping Zhang, Cheng-Hao Tu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 34 citations
- Co-Tuning for Transfer LearningKaichao You, Zhi Kou, Mingsheng Long, Jianmin WangNeurIPS 2020 · 105 citations
