Improving Generalization in LLM Structured Pruning via Function-Aware Neuron Grouping
Tao Yu, Yongqi An, Kuan Zhu, Guibo Zhu, Ming Tang, Jinqiao Wang
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive performance across natural language tasks but incur substantial computational and storage costs due to their scale. Post-training structured pruning offers an efficient solution. However, when few-shot calibration sets fail to adequately reflect the pretraining data distribution, existing methods exhibit limited generalization to downstream tasks. To address this issue, we propose Function-Aware Neuron Grouping (FANG), a post-training pruning framework that alleviates calibration bias by identifying and preserving neurons critical to specific function. FANG groups neurons with similar function based on the type of semantic context they process and prunes each group independently. During importance estimation within each group, tokens that strongly correlate with the functional role of the neuron group are given higher weighting. Additionally, FANG also preserves neurons that contribute across multiple context types. To achieve a better trade-off between sparsity and performance, it allocates sparsity to each block adaptively based on its functional complexity. Experiments show that FANG improves downstream accuracy while preserving language modeling performance. It achieves the state-of-the-art (SOTA) results when combined with FLAP and OBC, two representative pruning methods. Specifically, FANG outperforms FLAP and OBC by 1.5%–8.5% in average accuracy under 30% and 40% sparsity.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on20
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can be Accurately Pruned in One-ShotElias Frantar, Dan AlistarhICML 2023 · 1,240 citations
- A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language ModelsMingjie Sun, Zhuang Liu, Anna Bair, J. Zico KolterICLR 2024 · 794 citations
Related papers
- SEAP: Sparse Expert Activation Pruning Unlocks the Brainpower of Large Language ModelsXun Liang, Hanyu Wang, Huayi Lai, Simin Niu et al.AAAI 2026
- From Local to Global: Revisiting Structured Pruning Paradigms for Large Language ModelsZiyan Wang, Enmao Diao, Qi Le, Pu Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- GRASPrune: Global Gating for Budgeted Structured Pruning of Large Language ModelsZiyang Wang, Jiangfeng Xiao, Chuan Xiao, Ruoxiang Li et al.ACL 2026
- Sample-aware Adaptive Structured Pruning for Large Language ModelsJun Kong, Xinge Ma, Jin Wang, Xuejie ZhangAAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- Fluctuation-Based Adaptive Structured Pruning for Large Language ModelsYongqi An, Xu Zhao, Tao Yu, Ming Tang et al.AAAI 2024 · 130 citations
