From Local to Global: Revisiting Structured Pruning Paradigms for Large Language Models
Ziyan Wang, Enmao Diao, Qi Le, Pu Wang, Minwoo Lee, Shu-Ping Yeh, Evgeny Stupachenko, Hao Feng, Li Yang
Abstract
Structured pruning is a practical approach to deploying large language models (LLMs) efficiently, as it yields compact, hardware-friendly architectures. However, the dominant local paradigm is task-agnostic: by optimizing layer-wise reconstruction rather than task objectives, it tends to preserve perplexity or generic zero-shot behavior but fails to capitalize on modest task-specific calibration signals, often yielding limited downstream gains. We revisit global structured pruning and present GISP, Global Iterative Structured Pruning, a post-training method that removes attention heads and MLP channels using first-order, loss-based important scores aggregated at the structure level with block-wise normalization. Built on this global importance metric, GISP adopts an iterative schedule, rather than one-shot pruning, stabilizes accuracy at higher sparsity, and mitigates perplexity collapse without requiring intermediate fine-tuning. Importantly, the iterative pruning forms nested subnetworks that support a''prune-once, deploy-many''workflow. Furthermore, GISP defines structural importance directly with respect to a target loss, making it easy to adapt pruning to task-specific objectives. In this work, we use perplexity for language modeling and a margin-based objective for decision-style tasks. Extensive experiments show that across Llama2-7B/13B, Llama3-8B, and Mistral-0.3-7B, GISP consistently lowers WikiText-2 perplexity and improves on downstream accuracy, with especially strong gains at 40-50% sparsity; on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-3-8B and Qwen3-8B with GSM8K, task-aligned calibration substantially boosts exact-match accuracy. The implementation is available at https://github.com/uncc-efficient-ai/GISP.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ef1b20de-5b02-4fc2-ba85-10f84be8865dBuilds on13
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- Once-for-All: Train One Network and Specialize it for Efficient DeploymentHan Cai, Chuang Gan, Tianzhe Wang, Zhekai Zhang et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,522 citations
- SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can be Accurately Pruned in One-ShotElias Frantar, Dan AlistarhICML 2023 · 1,240 citations
- A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language ModelsMingjie Sun, Zhuang Liu, Anna Bair, J. Zico KolterICLR 2024 · 794 citations
Related papers
- GRASPrune: Global Gating for Budgeted Structured Pruning of Large Language ModelsZiyang Wang, Jiangfeng Xiao, Chuan Xiao, Ruoxiang Li et al.ACL 2026
- Týr-the-Pruner: Structural Pruning LLMs via Global Sparsity Distribution OptimizationGuanchen Li, Yixing Xu, Zeping Li, Ji Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- DenoiseRotator: Enhance Pruning Robustness for LLMs via Importance ConcentrationTianteng Gu, Bei Liu, Bo Xiao, Ke Zeng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Dual-Assessment Driven Pruning: Iterative Optimizing Layer-wise Sparsity for Large Language ModelQinghui Sun, Weilun Wang, Yanni Zhu, Shenghuan He et al.KDD 2024 · 3 citations
- SlimLLM: Accurate Structured Pruning for Large Language ModelsJialong Guo, Xinghao Chen, Yehui Tang, Yunhe WangICML 2025
