SEAP: Sparse Expert Activation Pruning Unlocks the Brainpower of Large Language Models
Xun Liang, Hanyu Wang, Huayi Lai, Simin Niu, Shichao Song, Jiawei Yang, Jihao Zhao, Feiyu Xiong, Bo Tang, Zhiyu Li
Abstract
Pruning is a promising approach to reduce the high inference cost of large language models (LLMs), but it often comes at the expense of performance. Motivated by the "functional localization" theory in neuroscience, we hypothesize that LLMs contain task-specific expert activation paths, where specific subsets of neurons are co-activated for particular tasks. This structure allows selective activation to preserve task performance while improving inference efficiency. We introduce Sparse Expert Activation Pruning (SEAP), a training-free pruning method for large language models. SEAP identifies task-relevant activation paths by analyzing the clustering patterns of hidden states and neuron activations on a multi-task calibration dataset. Cross-task transfer evaluations confirm the existence of such expert activation structures. SEAP constructs task-aware pruning masks by leveraging a task-expert calibration dataset, which provides representative samples across diverse tasks to reveal their activation signatures. It then employs a lightweight task router to dynamically select relevant computation paths based on the input task. This design significantly reduces inference cost without compromising accuracy. Experimental results show that SEAP retains model performance with only a 1.5% drop on most tasks at 20% sparsity, and at 50% sparsity, it surpasses strong pruning baselines such as WandA and FLAP by over 20%. These results highlight SEAP as a scalable and effective solution for efficient LLM inference.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b28dd320-ac39-4f4f-8848-7e5689a84cfaBuilds on13
- GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic ShardingDmitry Lepikhin, HyoukJoong Lee, Yuanzhong Xu, Dehao Chen et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,954 citations
- SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can be Accurately Pruned in One-ShotElias Frantar, Dan AlistarhICML 2023 · 1,240 citations
- LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language ModelsXinyin Ma, Gongfan Fang, Xinchao WangNeurIPS 2023 · 994 citations
- ZeroQuant: Efficient and Affordable Post-Training Quantization for Large-Scale TransformersZhewei Yao, Reza Yazdani Aminabadi, Minjia Zhang, Xiaoxia Wu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 816 citations
- A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language ModelsMingjie Sun, Zhuang Liu, Anna Bair, J. Zico KolterICLR 2024 · 794 citations
Related papers
- Dual Activation-Weight Sparsity: A Training-Free Framework for Efficient Large Language Model CompressionLuoyang Sun, Guangyan Li, Cheng Deng, Haifeng Zhang et al.ACL 2026
- Fluctuation-Based Adaptive Structured Pruning for Large Language ModelsYongqi An, Xu Zhao, Tao Yu, Ming Tang et al.AAAI 2024 · 130 citations
- WINA: Weight Informed Neuron Activation for Accelerating Large Language Model InferenceSihan Chen, Dan Zhao, Jongwoo Ko, Colby Banbury et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Improving Generalization in LLM Structured Pruning via Function-Aware Neuron GroupingTao Yu, Yongqi An, Kuan Zhu, Guibo Zhu et al.AAAI 2026
- Unraveling Babel: Exploring Multilingual Activation Patterns of LLMs and Their ApplicationsWeize Liu, Yinlong Xu, Hongxia Xu, Jintai Chen et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
