Online Nash Social Welfare Maximization with Predictions
Siddhartha Banerjee, Vasilis Gkatzelis, Artur Gorokh, Billy Jin
Abstract
We consider the problem of allocating a set of divisible goods to N agents in an online manner, aiming to maximize the Nash social welfare, a widely studied objective which provides a balance between fairness and efficiency. The goods arrive in a sequence of T periods and the value of each agent for a good is adversarially chosen when the good arrives. We first observe that no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio better than the trivial O(N ), unless it is given additional information about the agents' values.
Then, in line with the emerging area of "algorithms with predictions", we consider a setting where for each agent, the online algorithm is only given a prediction of her monopolist utility, i.e., her utility if all goods were given to her alone (corresponding to the sum of her values over the T periods). Our main result is an online algorithm whose competitive ratio is parameterized by the multiplicative errors in these predictions. The algorithm achieves a competitive ratio of O(log N ) and O(log T ) if the predictions are perfectly accurate. Moreover, the competitive ratio degrades smoothly with the errors in the predictions, and is surprisingly robust: the logarithmic competitive ratio holds even if the predictions are very inaccurate.
We complement this positive result by showing that our bounds are essentially tight: no online algorithm, even if provided with perfectly accurate predictions, can achieve a competitive ratio of O(log 1-N ) or O(log 1-T ) for any constant > 0.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1d173961-d8b7-4999-99ea-e7317b5b9b97Cited by top-tier papers20
- Online Bipartite Matching with Advice: Tight Robustness-Consistency Tradeoffs for the Two-Stage ModelBilly Jin, Will MaNeurIPS 2022 · 40 citations
- Universal and Tight Online Algorithms for Generalized-Mean WelfareSiddharth Barman, Arindam Khan, Arnab MaitiAAAI 2022 · 29 citations
- Randomized Strategic Facility Location with PredictionsEric Balkanski, Vasilis Gkatzelis, Golnoosh ShahkaramiNeurIPS 2024 · 29 citations
- Bicriteria Multidimensional Mechanism Design with Side InformationSiddharth Prasad, Maria-Florina Balcan, Tuomas SandholmNeurIPS 2023 · 26 citations
- Nonstationary Dual Averaging and Online Fair AllocationLuofeng Liao, Yuan Gao, Christian KroerNeurIPS 2022 · 19 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- Greedy-Based Online Fair Allocation with Adversarial Input: Enabling Best-of-Many-Worlds GuaranteesZongjun Yang, Luofeng Liao, Christian KroerAAAI 2024 · 2 citations
- Approximate Proportionality in Online Fair DivisionDavin Choo, Winston Fu, Tzeh Yuan Neoh, Tze-Yang Poon et al.ICML 2026 · 9 citations
- Online Algorithms for the Santa Claus ProblemMax Springer, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Debmalya Panigrahi, Mohammad Reza KhaniNeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- No-Regret Learning for Fair Multi-Agent Social Welfare OptimizationMengxiao Zhang, Ramiro Deo-Campo Vuong, Haipeng LuoNeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Online Fair Division with Additional InformationTzeh Yuan Neoh, Jannik Peters, Nicholas TehICML 2026 · 12 citations
