Online Fair Division with Additional Information
Tzeh Yuan Neoh, Jannik Peters, Nicholas Teh
Abstract
We study the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods to agents in an online setting, where goods arrive sequentially and must be allocated irrevocably. Focusing on the popular fairness notions of envy-freeness, proportionality, and maximin share fairness (and their approximate variants), we investigate how access to future information changes what guarantees are achievable. Without any information, we prove strong impossibility results even for approximate fairness. With normalization information (agents' total values), we provide an algorithm that achieves stronger fairness guarantees than previously known results, and show matching impossibilities for stronger notions. With frequency predictions (value multisets without order), we design a meta-algorithm that lifts a broad class of offline “share-based” guarantees to the online setting, matching the best-known offline bounds. Finally, we provide learning-augmented variants of both models: under noisy totals or noisy frequency predictions, our guarantees are robust and degrade gracefully with the error parameters.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a8db3682-a9ca-40f2-a51a-a970e378d0deCited by top-tier papers3
- Approximate Proportionality in Online Fair DivisionDavin Choo, Winston Fu, Tzeh Yuan Neoh, Tze-Yang Poon et al.ICML 2026 · 9 citations
- Fairness in Repeated Matching: A Maximin PerspectiveEugene Lim, Tzeh Yuan Neoh, Nicholas TehAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Centralized Group Equitability and Individual Envy-Freeness in the Allocation of Indivisible ItemsYing Wang, Jiaqian Li, Tianze Wei, Hau Chan et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on23
- Multiple Birds with One Stone: Beating 1/2 for EFX and GMMS via Envy Cycle EliminationGeorgios Amanatidis, Evangelos Markakis, Apostolos NtokosAAAI 2020 · 98 citations
- Perpetual Voting: Fairness in Long-Term Decision MakingMartin LacknerAAAI 2020 · 77 citations
- Online Knapsack with Frequency PredictionsSungjin Im, Ravi Kumar, Mahshid Montazer Qaem, Manish PurohitNeurIPS 2021 · 70 citations
- Universal and Tight Online Algorithms for Generalized-Mean WelfareSiddharth Barman, Arindam Khan, Arnab MaitiAAAI 2022 · 29 citations
- Rawlsian Fairness in Online Bipartite Matching: Two-Sided, Group, and IndividualSeyed A. Esmaeili, Sharmila Duppala, Davidson Cheng, Vedant Nanda et al.AAAI 2023 · 26 citations
Related papers
- Fair and Efficient Online Allocations with Normalized ValuationsVasilis Gkatzelis, Alexandros Psomas, Xizhi TanAAAI 2021 · 26 citations
- Achieving Proportionality up to the Maximin Item with Indivisible GoodsArtem Baklanov, Pranav Garimidi, Vasilis Gkatzelis, Daniel SchoepflinAAAI 2021 · 15 citations
- Online Fair Allocations with Binary Valuations and BeyondYuanyuan Wang, Tianze WeiAAAI 2026 · 5 citations
- Improved Maximin Share Guarantee for Additive ValuationsEhsan Heidari, Alireza Kaviani, Masoud Seddighin, AmirMohammad ShahrezaeiSODA 2026 · 1 citation
- Class Fairness in Online MatchingHadi Hosseini, Zhiyi Huang, Ayumi Igarashi, Nisarg ShahAAAI 2023 · 21 citations
