Interpretable Data-Based Explanations for Fairness Debugging
Romila Pradhan, Jiongli Zhu, Boris Glavic, Babak Salimi
Abstract
A wide variety of fairness metrics and eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches have been proposed in the literature to identify bias in machine learning models that are used in critical real-life contexts. However, merely reporting on a model's bias or generating explanations using existing XAI techniques is insufficient to locate and eventually mitigate sources of bias. We introduce Gopher, a system that produces compact, interpretable, and causal explanations for bias or unexpected model behavior by identifying coherent subsets of the training data that are root-causes for this behavior. Specifically, we introduce the concept of causal responsibility that quantifies the extent to which intervening on training data by removing or updating subsets of it can resolve the bias. Building on this concept, we develop an efficient approach for generating the top-k patterns that explain model bias by utilizing techniques from the machine learning (ML) community to approximate causal responsibility, and using pruning rules to manage the large search space for patterns. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of Gopher in generating interpretable explanations for identifying and debugging sources of bias.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1cf70f33-8b44-4245-bbac-62f25ac9aa0eCited by top-tier papers17
- Understanding the Black Box: A Deep Empirical Dive into Shapley Value Approximations for Tabular DataSuchit Gupte, John PaparrizosSIGMOD 2025 · 19 citations
- Automating and Optimizing Data-Centric What-If Analyses on Native Machine Learning PipelinesStefan Grafberger, Paul Groth, Sebastian SchelterSIGMOD 2023 · 18 citations
- On Data-Aware Global Explainability of Graph Neural NetworksGe Lv, Lei ChenVLDB 2023 · 16 citations
- MisDetect: Iterative Mislabel Detection using Early LossYuhao Deng, Chengliang Chai, Lei Cao, Nan Tang et al.VLDB 2024 · 13 citations
- A Unified Approach for Resilience and Causal Responsibility with Integer Linear Programming (ILP) and LP RelaxationsNeha Makhija, Wolfgang GatterbauerSIGMOD 2024 · 13 citations
Builds on15
- Machine UnlearningLucas Bourtoule, Varun Chandrasekaran, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Hengrui Jia et al.S&P 2021 · 1,381 citations
- Algorithmic Transparency via Quantitative Input Influence: Theory and Experiments with Learning SystemsAnupam Datta, Shayak Sen, Yair ZickS&P 2016 · 774 citations
- Adaptive Machine UnlearningVarun Gupta, Christopher Jung, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 262 citations
- Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilityChristopher Frye, Colin Rowat, Ilya FeigeNeurIPS 2020 · 246 citations
- A Distributional Framework For Data ValuationAmirata Ghorbani, Michael P. Kim, James ZouICML 2020 · 152 citations
Related papers
- Silva: Interactively Assessing Machine Learning Fairness Using CausalityJing Nathan Yan, Ziwei Gu, Hubert Lin, Jeffrey M. RzeszotarskiCHI 2020 · 53 citations
- Explaining Black-Box Algorithms Using Probabilistic Contrastive CounterfactualsSainyam Galhotra, Romila Pradhan, Babak SalimiSIGMOD 2021 · 85 citations
- BALANCE: Bayesian Linear Attribution for Root Cause LocalizationChaoyu Chen, Hang Yu, Zhichao Lei, Jianguo Li et al.SIGMOD 2023 · 11 citations
- Causal Explanations for Disparate Trends: Where and Why?Tal Blau, Brit Youngmann, Anna Fariha, Yuval MoskovitchSIGMOD 2026 · 2 citations
- D-BIAS: A Causality-Based Human-in-the-Loop System for Tackling Algorithmic BiasBhavya Ghai, Klaus MuellerIEEE VIS 2022 · 45 citations
