Understanding the Black Box: A Deep Empirical Dive into Shapley Value Approximations for Tabular Data
Suchit Gupte, John Paparrizos
Abstract
Understanding the decisions made by machine learning models is significant for building trust and enabling the adoption of these models in real-world applications. Shapley values have emerged as a leading method for model interpretability, offering precise insights by quantifying each feature's contribution to predictions. However, computing Shapley values requires exploring all possible combinations of features, which can be computationally expensive, especially for high-dimensional data. This challenge has led to the development of various approximation techniques, often composed of estimation and replacement strategies, to compute the Shapley values efficiently. Our study focuses on the interpretability of machine learning models for tabular datasets, one of the most common and widely used data type. However, the abundance of options has created a substantial gap in determining the most appropriate technique for practical applications. Through this study, we seek to bridge this gap by comprehensively evaluating Shapley value approximations, covering 8 replacement and 17 estimation strategies across diverse regression and classification tasks. The evaluation is conducted exclusively on tabular data, leveraging 200 synthetic and real-world datasets, covering a wide range of model types, from conventional tree-based and linear models to modern neural networks. We focus on computational efficiency and the consistency of Shapley value estimates in handling high-dimensional feature spaces. Our findings reveal that traditional sampling-based approaches significantly reduce computational costs but fail to capture complex feature interactions. On the contrary, model-specific approaches that exploit the structure of the underlying model consistently outperform model-agnostic techniques, delivering higher accuracy and faster computations. Through the study, we aim to encourage further research on Shapley value approximations, advancing data-centric explainable AI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 94d72c91-53fa-46ae-a190-9d3cfc1b06cbCited by top-tier papers4
- A Structured Study of Multivariate Time-Series Distance MeasuresJens E. d'Hondt, Haojun Li, Fan Yang, Odysseas Papapetrou et al.SIGMOD 2025 · 14 citations
- SPARTAN: Data-Adaptive Symbolic Time-Series ApproximationFan Yang, John PaparrizosSIGMOD 2025 · 11 citations
- The Power of Anomaly Detection in Predictive Maintenance: [Experiments & Analysis]Anastasios Papadopoulos, Apostolos Giannoulidis, Anastasios Gounaris, John PaparrizosSIGMOD 2026 · 4 citations
- HYDRA: A Multi-Level Hierarchy-Driven Approach for Robust Anomaly Detection in Time SeriesMingyi Huang, Qinghua Liu, Paul Boniol, John PaparrizosSIGMOD 2026 · 4 citations
Builds on33
- The Many Shapley Values for Model ExplanationMukund Sundararajan, Amir NajmiICML 2020 · 799 citations
- On Explainability of Graph Neural Networks via Subgraph ExplorationsHao Yuan, Haiyang Yu, Jie Wang, Kang Li et al.ICML 2021 · 498 citations
- Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth MasksRuth Fong, Mandela Patrick, Andrea VedaldiICCV 2019 · 480 citations
- FastSHAP: Real-Time Shapley Value EstimationNeil Jethani, Mukund Sudarshan, Ian Connick Covert, Su-In Lee et al.ICLR 2022 · 186 citations
- Volume Under the Surface: A New Accuracy Evaluation Measure for Time-Series Anomaly DetectionJohn Paparrizos, Paul Boniol, Themis Palpanas, Ruey S. Tsay et al.VLDB 2022 · 171 citations
Related papers
- CoShap: A Scalable Coalition Growth Approach to Shapley Value ApproximationJingxuan He, Changshuo Liu, Shaofeng Cai, Xixian Han et al.SIGMOD 2026
- Provably Accurate Shapley Value Estimation via Leverage Score SamplingChristopher Musco, R. Teal WitterICLR 2025
- Regression-adjusted Monte Carlo Estimators for Shapley Values and Probabilistic ValuesR. Teal Witter, Yurong Liu, Christopher MuscoNeurIPS 2025 · 22 citations
- Efficient Shapley Values Estimation by Amortization for Text ClassificationChenghao Yang, Fan Yin, He He, Kai-Wei Chang et al.ACL 2023 · 2 citations
- Prediction via Shapley Value RegressionAmr Alkhatib, Roman Bresson, Henrik Boström, Michalis VazirgiannisICML 2025
