Find A Winning Sign: Sign Is All We Need to Win the Lottery
Junghun Oh, Sungyong Baik, Kyoung Mu Lee
Abstract
The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) posits the existence of a sparse subnetwork (a.k.a. winning ticket) that can generalize comparably to its over-parameterized counterpart when trained from scratch. The common approach to finding a winning ticket is to preserve the original strong generalization through Iterative Pruning (IP) and transfer information useful for achieving the learned generalization by applying the resulting sparse mask to an untrained network. However, existing IP methods still struggle to generalize their observations beyond ad-hoc initialization and smallscale architectures or datasets, or they bypass these challenges by applying their mask to trained weights instead of initialized ones. In this paper, we demonstrate that the parameter sign configuration plays a crucial role in conveying useful information for generalization to any randomly initialized network. Through linear mode connectivity analysis, we observe that a sparse network trained by an existing IP method can retain its basin of attraction if its parameter signs and normalization layer parameters are preserved. To take a step closer to finding a winning ticket, we alleviate the reliance on normalization layer parameters by preventing high error barriers along the linear path between the sparse network trained by our method and its counterpart with initialized normalization layer parameters. Interestingly, across various architectures and datasets, we observe that any randomly initialized network can be optimized to exhibit low error barriers along the linear path to the sparse network trained by our method by inheriting its sparsity and parameter sign information, potentially achieving performance comparable to the original. The code is available at https://github.com/JungHunOh/AWS_ICLR2025.git
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1c881893-d0e8-43a8-b4e7-74ea6e389ad2Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on20
- MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for VisionIlya O. Tolstikhin, Neil Houlsby, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lucas Beyer et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 3,862 citations
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network PruningAlex Renda, Jonathan Frankle, Michael CarbinICLR 2020 · 437 citations
- Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You NeedEran Malach, Gilad Yehudai, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Ohad ShamirICML 2020 · 327 citations
- The Early Phase of Neural Network TrainingJonathan Frankle, David J. Schwab, Ari S. MorcosICLR 2020 · 199 citations
Related papers
- Lottery Ticket Preserves Weight Correlation: Is It Desirable or Not?Ning Liu, Geng Yuan, Zhengping Che, Xuan Shen et al.ICML 2021 · 34 citations
- The Elastic Lottery Ticket HypothesisXiaohan Chen, Yu Cheng, Shuohang Wang, Zhe Gan et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 38 citations
- Dual Lottery Ticket HypothesisYue Bai, Huan Wang, Zhiqiang Tao, Kunpeng Li et al.ICLR 2022 · 49 citations
- Sparse Training from Random Initialization: Aligning Lottery Ticket Masks using Weight SymmetryMohammed Adnan, Rohan Jain, Ekansh Sharma, Rahul Krishnan et al.ICML 2025
- Analyzing Lottery Ticket Hypothesis from PAC-Bayesian Theory PerspectiveKeitaro Sakamoto, Issei SatoNeurIPS 2022 · 11 citations
