Adaptive Localization of Knowledge Negation for Continual LLM Unlearning
Abudukelimu Wuerkaixi, Qizhou Wang, Sen Cui, Wutong Xu, Bo Han, Gang Niu, Masashi Sugiyama, Changshui Zhang
Abstract
With the growing deployment of large language models (LLMs) across diverse domains, concerns regarding their safety have grown substantially. LLM unlearning has emerged as a pivotal approach to removing harmful or unlawful content while maintaining utility. Despite increasing interest, the challenges of continual unlearning, which is common in real-world scenarios, remain underexplored. Successive unlearning tasks often lead to intensified utility degradation. To effectively unlearn targeted knowledge while preserving LLM utility, it is essential to minimize changes in model parameters by selectively updating those linked to the target knowledge, thereby ensuring other knowledge remains unaffected. Building on the task vector framework, we propose a new method named ALKN(Adaptive Localization of Knowledge Negation), which uses dynamic masking to sparsify training gradients and adaptively adjusts unlearning intensity based on inter-task relationships. Comprehensive experiments across three well-established LLM unlearning datasets demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms baseline methods in both unlearning effectiveness and utility retention under continual unlearning settings. 1 … Figure 1. An illustrative example of the LLM continual unlearning scenario. An LLM is integrated into a technical blog website, where some users occasionally close their accounts and request the deletion of their blog contents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- Unlearning Isn't Deletion: Investigating Reversibility of Machine Unlearning in LLMsXiaoyu Xu, Xiang Yue, Yang Liu, Qingqing Ye et al.ICML 2026 · 36 citations
- LLM Unlearning with LLM BeliefsKemou Li, Qizhou Wang, Yue Wang, Fengpeng Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 20 citations
- Explainable LLM Unlearning through ReasoningJunfeng Liao, Qizhou Wang, Shanshan Ye, Xin Yu et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Attention Smoothing Is All You Need For UnlearningSaleh Zare Zade, Xiangyu Zhou, Sijia Liu, Dongxiao ZhuICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Distinguishable Deletion: Unifying Knowledge Erasure and Refusal for Large Language Model UnlearningPuning Yang, Junchi Yu, Qizhou Wang, Phil Torr et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on22
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning ModelsChuan Guo, Tom Goldstein, Awni Y. Hannun, Laurens van der MaatenICML 2020 · 633 citations
- Amnesiac Machine LearningLaura Graves, Vineel Nagisetty, Vijay GaneshAAAI 2021 · 416 citations
- Large Language Model UnlearningYuanshun Yao, Xiaojun Xu, Yang LiuNeurIPS 2024 · 365 citations
Related papers
- On Large Language Model Continual UnlearningChongyang Gao, Lixu Wang, Kaize Ding, Chenkai Weng et al.ICLR 2025 · 1 citation
- Invariance Makes LLM Unlearning Resilient Even to Unanticipated Downstream Fine-TuningChangsheng Wang, Yihua Zhang, Jinghan Jia, Parikshit Ram et al.ICML 2025
- ALTER: Asymmetric LoRA for Token-Entropy-Guided Unlearning of LLMsXunlei Chen, Jinyu Guo, Yuang Li, Zhaokun Wang et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Towards Practical LLM Unlearning: Efficient, Modular, and Retain-FreePeng Liu, Peng-Fei Zhang, Jianfeng Qu, Ximing Li et al.WWW 2026
- Constrained Entropic Unlearning: A Primal-Dual Framework for Large Language ModelsTaha Entesari, Arman Hatami, Rinat Khaziev, Anil Ramakrishna et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
