Amnesiac Machine Learning
Laura Graves, Vineel Nagisetty, Vijay Ganesh
Abstract
The Right to be Forgotten is part of the recently enacted General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) law that affects any data holder that has data on European Union residents. It gives EU residents the ability to request deletion of their personal data, including training records used to train machine learning models. Unfortunately, Deep Neural Network models are vulnerable to information leaking attacks such as model inversion attacks which extract class information from a trained model and membership inference attacks which determine the presence of an example in a model's training data. If a malicious party can mount an attack and learn private information that was meant to be removed, then it implies that the model owner has not properly protected their user's rights and their models may not be compliant with the GDPR law. In this paper, we present two efficient methods that address this question of how a model owner or data holder may delete personal data from models in such a way that they may not be vulnerable to model inversion and membership inference attacks while maintaining model efficacy. We start by presenting a real-world threat model that shows that simply removing training data is insufficient to protect users. We follow that up with two data removal methods, namely Unlearning and Amnesiac Unlearning, that enable model owners to protect themselves against such attacks while being compliant with regulations. We provide extensive empirical analysis that show that these methods are indeed efficient, safe to apply, effectively remove learned information about sensitive data from trained models while maintaining model efficacy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0dadf0da-d0f7-46ec-8e9b-3f6d3f4631d4Cited by top-tier papers125
- Towards Unbounded Machine UnlearningMeghdad Kurmanji, Peter Triantafillou, Jamie Hayes, Eleni TriantafillouNeurIPS 2023 · 363 citations
- SalUn: Empowering Machine Unlearning via Gradient-based Weight Saliency in Both Image Classification and GenerationChongyu Fan, Jiancheng Liu, Yihua Zhang, Eric Wong et al.ICLR 2024 · 351 citations
- Model Sparsity Can Simplify Machine UnlearningJinghan Jia, Jiancheng Liu, Parikshit Ram, Yuguang Yao et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 293 citations
- Can Bad Teaching Induce Forgetting? Unlearning in Deep Networks Using an Incompetent TeacherVikram S. Chundawat, Ayush K. Tarun, Murari Mandal, Mohan S. KankanhalliAAAI 2023 · 247 citations
- In-Context Unlearning: Language Models as Few-Shot UnlearnersMartin Pawelczyk, Seth Neel, Himabindu LakkarajuICML 2024 · 217 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- When Machine Unlearning Jeopardizes PrivacyMin Chen, Zhikun Zhang, Tianhao Wang, Michael Backes et al.CCS 2021 · 146 citations
- Learn What You Want to Unlearn: Unlearning Inversion Attacks against Machine UnlearningHongsheng Hu, Shuo Wang, Tian Dong, Minhui XueS&P 2024 · 62 citations
- Reminiscence Attack on Residuals: Exploiting Approximate Machine Unlearning for PrivacyYaxin Xiao, Qingqing Ye, Li Hu, Huadi Zheng et al.ICCV 2025 · 6 citations
- Machine Unlearning for Image Retrieval: A Generative Scrubbing ApproachPeng-Fei Zhang, Guangdong Bai, Zi Huang, Xin-Shun XuACM MM 2022 · 17 citations
- Machine Unlearning in Gradient Boosting Decision TreesHuawei Lin, Jun Woo Chung, Yingjie Lao, Weijie ZhaoKDD 2023 · 13 citations
