Pruning Randomly Initialized Neural Networks with Iterative Randomization
Daiki Chijiwa, Shin'ya Yamaguchi, Yasutoshi Ida, Kenji Umakoshi, Tomohiro Inoue
Abstract
Pruning the weights of randomly initialized neural networks plays an important role in the context of lottery ticket hypothesis. Ramanujan et al. (2020) empirically showed that only pruning the weights can achieve remarkable performance instead of optimizing the weight values. However, to achieve the same level of performance as the weight optimization, the pruning approach requires more parameters in the networks before pruning and thus more memory space. To overcome this parameter inefficiency, we introduce a novel framework to prune randomly initialized neural networks with iteratively randomizing weight values (IteRand). Theoretically, we prove an approximation theorem in our framework, which indicates that the randomizing operations are provably effective to reduce the required number of the parameters. We also empirically demonstrate the parameter efficiency in multiple experiments on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet. The code is available at: https://github.com/dchiji-ntt/iterand
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1b7b6b41-3d85-4c3e-9a37-15db4a65d180Cited by top-tier papers13
- Pruner-Zero: Evolving Symbolic Pruning Metric From Scratch for Large Language ModelsPeijie Dong, Lujun Li, Zhenheng Tang, Xiang Liu et al.ICML 2024 · 64 citations
- The Combinatorial Brain Surgeon: Pruning Weights That Cancel One Another in Neural NetworksXin Yu, Thiago Serra, Srikumar Ramalingam, Shandian ZheICML 2022 · 60 citations
- Sparse Binary Transformers for Multivariate Time Series ModelingMatt Gorbett, Hossein Shirazi, Indrakshi RayKDD 2023 · 18 citations
- Differentiable Transportation PruningYunqiang Li, Jan C. van Gemert, Torsten Hoefler, Bert Moons et al.ICCV 2023 · 17 citations
- Signing the Supermask: Keep, Hide, InvertNils Koster, Oliver Grothe, Achim RettingerICLR 2022 · 14 citations
Builds on9
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 884 citations
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 743 citations
- Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets WinnersUtku Evci, Trevor Gale, Jacob Menick, Pablo Samuel Castro et al.ICML 2020 · 723 citations
- Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You NeedEran Malach, Gilad Yehudai, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Ohad ShamirICML 2020 · 327 citations
- Pruning from ScratchYulong Wang, Xiaolu Zhang, Lingxi Xie, Jun Zhou et al.AAAI 2020 · 219 citations
Related papers
- DropNet: Reducing Neural Network Complexity via Iterative PruningChong Min John Tan, Mehul MotaniICML 2020 · 74 citations
- Plant 'n' Seek: Can You Find the Winning Ticket?Jonas Fischer, Rebekka BurkholzICLR 2022 · 21 citations
- Why Random Pruning Is All We Need to Start SparseAdvait Harshal Gadhikar, Sohom Mukherjee, Rebekka BurkholzICML 2023 · 33 citations
- Validating the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis with Inertial Manifold TheoryZeru Zhang, Jiayin Jin, Zijie Zhang, Yang Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 45 citations
- Lottery Ticket Preserves Weight Correlation: Is It Desirable or Not?Ning Liu, Geng Yuan, Zhengping Che, Xuan Shen et al.ICML 2021 · 34 citations
