More than Model Documentation: Uncovering Teachers' Bespoke Information Needs for Informed Classroom Integration of ChatGPT
Mei Tan, Hariharan Subramonyam
Abstract
ChatGPT has entered classrooms, circumventing typical training and vetting procedures. Unlike other educational technologies, it placed teachers in direct contact with the versatility of generative AI. Consequently, teachers are urgently tasked to assess its capabilities to inform their use of ChatGPT. However, it is unclear what support teachers have and need and whether existing documentation, such as model cards, provides adequate direction for educators in this new paradigm. By interviewing 22 middle- and high-school ELA and Social Studies teachers, we connect the discourse on AI transparency and documentation with educational technology integration, highlighting the information needs of teachers. Our findings reveal that teachers confront significant information gaps, lacking clarity on exploring ChatGPT’s capabilities for bespoke learning tasks and ensuring its fit with the needs of diverse learners. As a solution, we propose a framework for interactive model documentation that empowers teachers to navigate the interplay between pedagogical and technical knowledge.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1b286988-9242-44f5-bb36-9dc13d720766Cited by top-tier papers12
- "Don't Forget the Teachers": Towards an Educator-Centered Understanding of Harms from Large Language Models in EducationEmma Harvey, Allison Koenecke, René F. KizilcecCHI 2025 · 63 citations
- Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature ReviewRock Yuren Pang, Hope Schroeder, Kynnedy Simone Smith, Solon Barocas et al.CHI 2025 · 51 citations
- How CO2STLY Is CHI? The Carbon Footprint of Generative AI in HCI Research and What We Should Do About ItNanna Inie, Jeanette Falk, Raghavendra SelvanCHI 2025 · 33 citations
- PolicyCraft: Supporting Collaborative and Participatory Policy Design through Case-Grounded DeliberationTzu-Sheng Kuo, Quan Ze Chen, Amy X. Zhang, Jane Hsieh et al.CHI 2025 · 26 citations
- Breaking Barriers or Building Dependency? Exploring Team-LLM Collaboration in AI-infused Classroom DebateZihan Zhang, Black Sun, Pengcheng AnCHI 2025 · 24 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Making ChatGPT Work for MeSamantha M. Keppler, Wichinpong Park Sinchaisri, Clare SnyderCSCW 2025 · 8 citations
- Testing, Socializing, Exploring: Characterizing Middle Schoolers' Approaches to and Conceptions of ChatGPTYasmine Belghith, Atefeh Mahdavi Goloujeh, Brian Magerko, Duri Long et al.CHI 2024 · 30 citations
- Teachers, Parents, and Students' perspectives on Integrating Generative AI into Elementary Literacy EducationAriel Han, Xiaofei Zhou, Zhenyao Cai, Shenshen Han et al.CHI 2024 · 104 citations
- Relief or displacement? How teachers are negotiating generative AI's role in their professional practiceAayushi Dangol, Smriti Kotiyal, Robert Wolfe, Alex J. Bowers et al.CHI 2026 · 5 citations
- Exploring Teacher-Chatbot Interaction and Affect in Block-Based ProgrammingBahare Riahi, Ally Limke, Xiaoyi Tian, Viktoriia Storozhevykh et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
