Seeing Culture: A Benchmark for Visual Reasoning and Grounding
Burak Satar, Zhixin Ma, Patrick Amadeus Irawan, Wilfried A. Mulyawan, Jing Jiang, Ee-Peng Lim, Chong-Wah Ngo
Abstract
Multimodal vision-language models (VLMs) have made substantial progress in various tasks that require a combined understanding of visual and textual content, particularly in cultural understanding tasks, with the emergence of new cultural datasets. However, these datasets frequently fall short of providing cultural reasoning while underrepresenting many cultures. In this paper, we introduce the Seeing Culture Benchmark (SCB), focusing on cultural reasoning with a novel approach that requires VLMs to reason on culturally rich images in two stages: i) selecting the correct visual option with multiple-choice visual question answering (VQA), and ii) segmenting the relevant cultural artifact as evidence of reasoning. Visual options in the first stage are systematically organized into three types: those originating from the same country, those from different countries, or a mixed group. Notably, all options are derived from a singular category for each type. Progression to the second stage occurs only after a correct visual option is chosen. The SCB benchmark comprises 1,065 images that capture 138 cultural artifacts across five categories from seven Southeast Asia countries, whose diverse cultures are often overlooked, accompanied by 3,178 questions, of which 1,093 are unique and meticulously curated by human annotators. Our evaluation of various VLMs reveals the complexities involved in cross-modal cultural reasoning and highlights the disparity between visual reasoning and spatial grounding in culturally nuanced scenarios. The SCB serves as a crucial benchmark for identifying these shortcomings, thereby guiding future developments in the field of cultural reasoning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1b1ac916-5cc1-4fc7-afc7-c5143a006292Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction TuningWenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,013 citations
- What matters when building vision-language models?Hugo Laurençon, Léo Tronchon, Matthieu Cord, Victor SanhNeurIPS 2024 · 401 citations
- Visually Grounded Reasoning across Languages and CulturesFangyu Liu, Emanuele Bugliarello, Edoardo Maria Ponti, Siva Reddy et al.EMNLP 2021 · 87 citations
- Broaden the Vision: Geo-Diverse Visual Commonsense ReasoningDa Yin, Liunian Harold Li, Ziniu Hu, Nanyun Peng et al.EMNLP 2021 · 32 citations
- Crossmodal-3600: A Massively Multilingual Multimodal Evaluation DatasetAshish V. Thapliyal, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Xi Chen, Radu SoricutEMNLP 2022 · 31 citations
Related papers
- From Local Concepts to Universals: Evaluating the Multicultural Understanding of Vision-Language ModelsMehar Bhatia, Sahithya Ravi, Aditya Chinchure, Eunjeong Hwang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 6 citations
- CVLUE: A New Benchmark Dataset for Chinese Vision-Language Understanding EvaluationYuxuan Wang, Yijun Liu, Fei Yu, Chen Huang et al.AAAI 2025 · 7 citations
- MMAC: A Multilingual, Multimodal Alignment Framework for Cultural Grounding EvaluationWeihua Zheng, Zhengyuan Liu, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Weiwen Xu et al.ACL 2026
- RAVENEA: A Benchmark for Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Visual Culture UnderstandingJiaang Li, Yifei Yuan, Wenyan Li, Mohammad Aliannejadi et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- KRETA: A Benchmark for Korean Reading and Reasoning in Text-Rich VQA Attuned to Diverse Visual ContextsTaebaek Hwang, Minseo Kim, Gisang Lee, Seonuk Kim et al.EMNLP 2025
