Smarter Contracts: Detecting Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts with Deep Transfer Learning
Christoph Sendner, Huili Chen, Hossein Fereidooni, Lukas Petzi, Jan König, Jasper Stang, Alexandra Dmitrienko, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi, Farinaz Koushanfar
Abstract
—Ethereum smart contracts are automated decentralized applications on the blockchain that describe the terms of the agreement between buyers and sellers, reducing the need for trusted intermediaries and arbitration. However, the deployment of smart contracts introduces new attack vectors into the cryptocurrency systems. In particular, programming flaws in smart contracts have been already exploited to lead to enormous financial loss. Hence, it is crucial to detect various vulnerability types in contracts effectively and efficiently. Existing vulnerability detection methods are limited in scope as they typically focus on one or a very limited set of vulnerabilities. Also, extending them to new vulnerability types requires costly re-design. In this work, we develop ESCORT, a deep learning-based vulnerability detection method that uses a common feature extractor to learn generic bytecode semantics of smart contracts and separate branches to learn the features of each vulnerability type. As a multi-label classifier, ESCORT can detect multiple vulnerabilities of the contract at once. Compared to prior detection methods, ESCORT can be easily extended to new vulnerability types with limited data via transfer learning. When a new vulnerability type emerges, ESCORT adds a new branch to the trained feature extractor and trains it with limited data. We evaluated ESCORT on a dataset of 3.61 million smart contracts and demonstrate that it achieves an average F1 score of 98 % on six vulnerability types in initial training and yields an average F1 score of 96 % in transfer learning phase on five additional vulnerability types. To the best of our knowledge, ESCORT is the first deep learning-based framework that utilizes transfer learning on new vulnerability types with minimal model modification and re-training overhead. Compared with existing non-ML tools, ESCORT can be applied to contracts of arbitrary complexity and ensures 100% contract coverage. In addition, we enable concurrent detection of multiple vulnerability types using a single unified framework, thus avoiding the efforts of setting up
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 19acf57c-bd2f-4b45-8682-42260ecb3e91Cited by top-tier papers11
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Tools for Smart Contracts: How Far Are We?Kaixuan Li, Yue Xue, Sen Chen, Han Liu et al.FSE 2024 · 26 citations
- EaTVul: ChatGPT-based Evasion Attack Against Software Vulnerability DetectionShigang Liu, Di Cao, Junae Kim, Tamas Abraham et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 13 citations
- Pulling Off The Mask: Forensic Analysis of the Deceptive Creator Wallets Behind Smart Contract FraudMingxuan Yao, Runze Zhang, Haichuan Xu, Shih-Huan Chou et al.S&P 2024 · 10 citations
- Identifying Smart Contract Security Issues in Code Snippets from Stack OverflowJiachi Chen, Chong Chen, Jiang Hu, John C. Grundy et al.ISSTA 2024 · 9 citations
- When Contracts Meets Crypto: Exploring Developers' Struggles with Ethereum Cryptographic APIsJiashuo Zhang, Jiachi Chen, Zhiyuan Wan, Ting Chen et al.ICSE 2024 · 9 citations
Builds on11
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena et al.CCS 2016 · 2,306 citations
- GraphCodeBERT: Pre-training Code Representations with Data FlowDaya Guo, Shuo Ren, Shuai Lu, Zhangyin Feng et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,644 citations
- Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart ContractsPetar Tsankov, Andrei Marian Dan, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Arthur Gervais et al.CCS 2018 · 1,108 citations
- ZEUS: Analyzing Safety of Smart ContractsSukrit Kalra, Seep Goel, Mohan Dhawan, Subodh SharmaNDSS 2018 · 595 citations
- teEther: Gnawing at Ethereum to Automatically Exploit Smart ContractsJohannes Krupp, Christian RossowUSENIX Security 2018 · 345 citations
Related papers
- Smart Learning to Find Dumb ContractsTamer Abdelaziz, Aquinas HoborUSENIX Security 2023
- Reentrancy Vulnerability Detection and Localization: A Deep Learning Based Two-phase ApproachZhuo Zhang, Yan Lei, Meng Yan, Yue Yu et al.ASE 2022 · 56 citations
- Improving Smart Contract Security with Contrastive Learning-based Vulnerability DetectionYizhou Chen, Zeyu Sun, Zhihao Gong, Dan HaoICSE 2024 · 44 citations
- BugSweeper: Function-Level Detection of Smart Contract Vulnerabilities Using Graph Neural NetworksUisang Lee, Changhoon Chung, Junmo Lee, Soo-Mook MoonAAAI 2026
- LookAhead: Preventing DeFi Attacks via Unveiling Adversarial ContractsShoupeng Ren, Lipeng He, Tianyu Tu, Di Wu et al.FSE 2025 · 3 citations
