Relational AI: Facilitating Intergroup Cooperation with Socially Aware Conversational Support
Elijah L. Claggett, Robert E. Kraut, Hirokazu Shirado
Abstract
Cooperation is challenging when group identities are involved. While people readily cooperate with in-group members, they struggle to build trust with out-group members. This study examines how text suggestions generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) can mitigate in-group-out-group bias and facilitate intergroup cooperation through conversations. We conducted an experiment with 482 participants who communicated with either in-group partners sharing their views or out-group partners with differing views, based on a preliminary survey. Participants received either “personalized” message suggestions aligned with their own views and conversation styles or “relational” suggestions using conversation styles tailored to whether their partner was in-group or out-group. Following the conversations, participants engaged in a cooperation game designed to measure trust behaviorally. Our results show that while personalized assistance widened the cooperation gap, relational assistance significantly improved out-group cooperation to match in-group levels. We discuss design implications for integrating social awareness into AI-driven conversational support systems.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 18253cff-facf-48f2-b2dd-f3b87dd078a7Cited by top-tier papers4
- Negotiating Digital Identities with AI Companions: Motivations, Strategies, and Emotional OutcomesRenkai Ma, Shuo Niu, Lingyao Li, Alex Hirth et al.CHI 2026 · 7 citations
- Futuring Social Assemblages: How Enmeshing AIs into Social Life Challenges the Individual and the InterpersonalLingqing Wang, Yingting Gao, Chidimma Lois Anyi, Ashok K. GoelCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Bringing Everyone to the Table: An Experimental Study of LLM-Facilitated Group Decision MakingMohammed Alsobay, David M. Rothschild, Jake M. Hofman, Daniel G. GoldsteinCSCW 2026 · 2 citations
- Investigating LLM-Powered Dissenting Minority Support in Power-Imbalanced Group Decision-Making: Counterargument and Mediation as Intervention StrategiesSoohwan Lee, Seoyeong Hwang, Mingyu Kim, Dajung Kim et al.CSCW 2026
Related papers
- From Single to Societal: Analyzing Persona-Induced Bias in Multi-Agent InteractionsJiayi Li, Xiao Liu, Yansong FengAAAI 2026 · 3 citations
- Leveraging Large Language Models for Collective Decision-MakingMarios Papachristou, Longqi Yang, Chin-Chia HsuCSCW 2025 · 10 citations
- Comparing Sentence-Level Suggestions to Message-Level Suggestions in AI-Mediated CommunicationLiye Fu, Benjamin Newman, Maurice Jakesch, Sarah KrepsCHI 2023 · 28 citations
- "The less I type, the better": How AI Language Models can Enhance or Impede Communication for AAC UsersStephanie Valencia, Richard Cave, Krystal Kallarackal, Katie Seaver et al.CHI 2023 · 92 citations
- Reading Between the Prompts: How Stereotypes Shape LLM's Implicit PersonalizationVera Neplenbroek, Arianna Bisazza, Raquel FernándezEMNLP 2025
