From Single to Societal: Analyzing Persona-Induced Bias in Multi-Agent Interactions
Jiayi Li, Xiao Liu, Yansong Feng
Abstract
Large Language Model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems are increasingly used to simulate human interactions and solve collaborative tasks. A common practice is to assign agents with personas to encourage behavioral diversity. However, this raises a critical yet underexplored question: do personas introduce biases into multi-agent interactions? This paper presents a systematic investigation into persona-induced biases in multi-agent interactions, with a focus on social traits like trustworthiness (how an agent's opinion is received by others) and insistence (how strongly an agent advocates for its opinion). Through a series of controlled experiments in collaborative problem-solving and persuasion tasks, we reveal that (1) LLM-based agents exhibit biases in both trustworthiness and insistence, with personas from historically advantaged groups (e.g., men and White individuals) perceived as less trustworthy and demonstrating less insistence; and (2) agents exhibit significant in-group favoritism, showing a higher tendency to conform to others who share the same persona. These biases persist across various LLMs, group sizes, and numbers of interaction rounds, highlighting an urgent need for awareness and mitigation to ensure the fairness and reliability of multi-agent systems. Code - https://github.com/Jiayi-LizzZ/Persona-Induced- Bias-in-MAS.git Introduction With the rapid growth of Large Language Models (LLMs), LLM-based multi-agent systems have become a powerful paradigm for simulating human-like interactions and solving collaborative tasks (Guo et al. 2024; Mou et al. 2024) . By modeling intricate group behaviors and facilitating distributed decision-making, these systems become invaluable for enhancing the reasoning abilities of LLMs. A common practice in these systems is to equip each agent with distinct personas, such as demographic information, personality traits, and domain expertise, allowing them to exhibit diverse behaviors (Bhandari et al. 2025 ). However, while personas enrich agent behavior, they also introduce a critical concern: the potential for inducing bias.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 594a65a8-d193-4f8f-8624-60df9bb3ff82Builds on4
- Bias Runs Deep: Implicit Reasoning Biases in Persona-Assigned LLMsShashank Gupta, Vaishnavi Shrivastava, Ameet Deshpande, Ashwin Kalyan et al.ICLR 2024 · 212 citations
- Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology ViewJintian Zhang, Xin Xu, Ningyu Zhang, Ruibo Liu et al.ACL 2024
- Do as We Do, Not as You Think: the Conformity of Large Language ModelsZhiyuan Weng, Guikun Chen, Wenguan WangICLR 2025
- MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative FrameworkSirui Hong, Mingchen Zhuge, Jonathan Chen, Xiawu Zheng et al.ICLR 2024
Related papers
- Deus Ex Machina and Personas from Large Language Models: Investigating the Composition of AI-Generated Persona DescriptionsJoni Salminen, Chang Liu, Wenjing Pian, Jianxing Chi et al.CHI 2024 · 55 citations
- Inertia in Moral and Value Judgments of Large Language ModelsBruce W. Lee, Yeongheon Lee, Hyunsoo ChoACL 2026 · 5 citations
- Relational AI: Facilitating Intergroup Cooperation with Socially Aware Conversational SupportElijah L. Claggett, Robert E. Kraut, Hirokazu ShiradoCHI 2025 · 10 citations
- Can LLM Agents Maintain a Persona in Discourse?Pranav Bhandari, Nicolas Fay, Michael J. Wise, Amitava Datta et al.EMNLP 2025
- LLM Agents Can Be Choice-Supportive Biased Evaluators: An Empirical StudyNan Zhuang, Boyu Cao, Yi Yang, Jing Xu et al.AAAI 2025 · 4 citations
