DriveAdapter: Breaking the Coupling Barrier of Perception and Planning in End-to-End Autonomous Driving
Xiaosong Jia, Yulu Gao, Li Chen, Junchi Yan, Patrick Langechuan Liu, Hongyang Li
Abstract
End-to-end autonomous driving aims to build a fully differentiable system that takes raw sensor data as inputs and directly outputs the planned trajectory or control signals of the ego vehicle. State-of-the-art methods usually follow the ‘Teacher-Student’ paradigm. The Teacher model uses privileged information (ground-truth states of surrounding agents and map elements) to learn the driving strategy. The student model only has access to raw sensor data and conducts behavior cloning on the data collected by the teacher model. By eliminating the noise of the perception part during planning learning, state-of-the-art works could achieve better performance with significantly less data compared to those coupled ones.However, under the current Teacher-Student paradigm, the student model still needs to learn a planning head from scratch, which could be challenging due to the redundant and noisy nature of raw sensor inputs and the casual confusion issue of behavior cloning. In this work, we aim to explore the possibility of directly adopting the strong teacher model to conduct planning while letting the student model focus more on the perception part. We find that even equipped with a SOTA perception model, directly letting the student model learn the required inputs of the teacher model leads to poor driving performance, which comes from the large distribution gap between predicted privileged inputs and the ground-truth.To this end, we propose DriveAdapter, which employs adapters with the feature alignment objective function between the student (perception) and teacher (planning) modules. Additionally, since the pure learning-based teacher model itself is imperfect and occasionally breaks safety rules, we propose a method of action-guided feature learning with a mask for those imperfect teacher features to further inject the priors of hand-crafted rules into the learning process. DriveAdapter achieves SOTA performance on multiple closed-loop simulation-based benchmarks of CARLA.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 16a2418b-3c3d-4182-87cf-b54f7c6a30c2Cited by top-tier papers56
- Vista: A Generalizable Driving World Model with High Fidelity and Versatile ControllabilityShenyuan Gao, Jiazhi Yang, Li Chen, Kashyap Chitta et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 403 citations
- AutoVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Adaptive Reasoning and Reinforcement Fine-TuningZewei Zhou, Tianhui Cai, Seth Z. Zhao, Yun Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 310 citations
- VADv2: End-to-End Vectorized Autonomous Driving via Probabilistic PlanningBo Jiang, Shaoyu Chen, Hao Gao, Bencheng Liao et al.ICLR 2026 · 259 citations
- ReCogDrive: A Reinforced Cognitive Framework for End-to-End Autonomous DrivingYongkang Li, Kaixin Xiong, Xiangyu Guo, Fang Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 196 citations
- LMDrive: Closed-Loop End-to-End Driving with Large Language ModelsHao Shao, Yuxuan Hu, Letian Wang, Guanglu Song et al.CVPR 2024 · 114 citations
Builds on19
- BEVDepth: Acquisition of Reliable Depth for Multi-View 3D Object DetectionYinhao Li, Zheng Ge, Guanyi Yu, Jinrong Yang et al.AAAI 2023 · 954 citations
- Exploring the Limitations of Behavior Cloning for Autonomous DrivingFelipe Codevilla, Eder Santana, Antonio M. López, Adrien GaidonICCV 2019 · 666 citations
- Trajectory-guided Control Prediction for End-to-end Autonomous Driving: A Simple yet Strong BaselinePenghao Wu, Xiaosong Jia, Li Chen, Junchi Yan et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 444 citations
- End-to-End Urban Driving by Imitating a Reinforcement Learning CoachZhejun Zhang, Alexander Liniger, Dengxin Dai, Fisher Yu et al.ICCV 2021 · 313 citations
- NEAT: Neural Attention Fields for End-to-End Autonomous DrivingKashyap Chitta, Aditya Prakash, Andreas GeigerICCV 2021 · 274 citations
Related papers
- Coaching a Teachable StudentJimuyang Zhang, Zanming Huang, Eshed Ohn-BarCVPR 2023
- Raw2Drive: Reinforcement Learning with Aligned World Models for End-to-End Autonomous Driving (in CARLA v2)Zhenjie Yang, Xiaosong Jia, Qifeng Li, Xue Yang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 65 citations
- LEAD: Minimizing Learner-Expert Asymmetry in End-to-End DrivingLong Nguyen, Micha Fauth, Bernhard Jaeger, Daniel Dauner et al.CVPR 2026 · 28 citations
- Perception in Plan: Coupled Perception and Planning for End-to-End Autonomous DrivingBozhou Zhang, Jingyu Li, Nan Song, Li ZhangAAAI 2026
- DriveDPO: Policy Learning via Safety DPO For End-to-End Autonomous DrivingShuyao Shang, Yuntao Chen, Yuqi Wang, Yingyan Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 49 citations
