Exploring the Limitations of Behavior Cloning for Autonomous Driving
Felipe Codevilla, Eder Santana, Antonio M. López, Adrien Gaidon
Abstract
Driving requires reacting to a wide variety of complex environment conditions and agent behaviors. Explicitly modeling each possible scenario is unrealistic. In contrast, imitation learning can, in theory, leverage data from large fleets of human-driven cars. Behavior cloning in particular has been successfully used to learn simple visuomotor policies end-to-end, but scaling to the full spectrum of driving behaviors remains an unsolved problem. In this paper, we propose a new benchmark to experimentally investigate the scalability and limitations of behavior cloning. We show that behavior cloning leads to state-of-the-art results, executing complex lateral and longitudinal maneuvers, even in unseen environments, without being explicitly programmed to do so. However, we confirm some limitations of the behavior cloning approach: some well-known limitations (e.g., dataset bias and overfitting), new generalization issues (e.g., dynamic objects and the lack of a causal modeling), and training instabilities, all requiring further research before behavior cloning can graduate to real-world driving. The code, dataset, benchmark, and agent studied in this paper can be found at github.com/felipecode/coiltraine/blob/master/docs/exploring_limitations.md
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1fb59586-b97b-49bc-8f9a-f793b8a99002Cited by top-tier papers86
- VAD: Vectorized Scene Representation for Efficient Autonomous DrivingBo Jiang, Shaoyu Chen, Qing Xu, Bencheng Liao et al.ICCV 2023 · 602 citations
- Behavior Transformers: Cloning modes with one stoneNur Muhammad Shafiullah, Zichen Jeff Cui, Ariuntuya Altanzaya, Lerrel PintoNeurIPS 2022 · 470 citations
- Trajectory-guided Control Prediction for End-to-end Autonomous Driving: A Simple yet Strong BaselinePenghao Wu, Xiaosong Jia, Li Chen, Junchi Yan et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 444 citations
- End-to-End Urban Driving by Imitating a Reinforcement Learning CoachZhejun Zhang, Alexander Liniger, Dengxin Dai, Fisher Yu et al.ICCV 2021 · 313 citations
- NEAT: Neural Attention Fields for End-to-End Autonomous DrivingKashyap Chitta, Aditya Prakash, Andreas GeigerICCV 2021 · 274 citations
Related papers
- Learning Situational DrivingEshed Ohn-Bar, Aditya Prakash, Aseem Behl, Kashyap Chitta et al.CVPR 2020
- Model-Based Imitation Learning for Urban DrivingAnthony Hu, Gianluca Corrado, Nicolas Griffiths, Zachary Murez et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 241 citations
- IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for ImitationDivyansh Garg, Shuvam Chakraborty, Chris Cundy, Jiaming Song et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 271 citations
- Keyframe-Focused Visual Imitation LearningChuan Wen, Jierui Lin, Jianing Qian, Yang Gao et al.ICML 2021 · 27 citations
- CoIRL-AD: Collaborative-Competitive Imitation-Reinforcement Learning in Latent World Models for Autonomous DrivingXiaoji Zheng, Ziyuan Yang, Yanhao Chen, Yuhang PENG et al.ICML 2026
