EMNLP Findings2023
R³ Prompting: Review, Rephrase and Resolve for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models under Noisy Context
Qingyuan Tian, Hanlun Zhu, Lei Wang, Yang Li, Yunshi Lan
Abstract
With the help of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on various reasoning tasks. However, most of them have been evaluated under noise-free context and the dilemma for LLMs to produce inaccurate results under the noisy context has not been fully investigated. Existing studies utilize trigger sentences to encourage LLMs to concentrate on the relevant information but the trigger has limited effect on final answer prediction. Inspired by interactive CoT method, where intermediate reasoning steps are promoted by multiple rounds of interaction between users and LLMs, we propose a novel prompting method, namely R 3 prompting, for CoT reasoning under noisy context. Specifically, R 3 prompting interacts with LLMs to perform key sentence extraction, variable declaration and answer prediction, which corresponds to a thought process of reviewing, rephrasing and resolving. The responses generated at the last interaction will perform as hints to guide toward the responses of the next interaction. Our experiments show that R 3 prompting significantly outperforms existing CoT prompting methods on five reasoning tasks under noisy context. With GPT-3.5-turbo, we observe 3.7% accuracy improvement on average on the reasoning tasks under noisy context compared to the most competitive prompting baseline. More analyses and ablation studies show the robustness and generalization of R 3 prompting method in solving reasoning tasks in LLMs under noisy context.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Builds on13
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant ContextFreda Shi, Xinyun Chen, Kanishka Misra, Nathan Scales et al.ICML 2023 · 970 citations
Related papers
- INFORM : Information eNtropy based multi-step reasoning FOR large language ModelsChuyue Zhou, Wangjie You, Juntao Li, Jing Ye et al.EMNLP 2023 · 2 citations
- Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-VerificationYixuan Weng, Minjun Zhu, Fei Xia, Bin Li et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 110 citations
- Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language ModelsZhuosheng Zhang, Aston Zhang, Mu Li, Alex SmolaICLR 2023 · 234 citations
- The Impact of Reasoning Step Length on Large Language ModelsMingyu Jin, Qinkai Yu, Dong Shu, Haiyan Zhao et al.ACL Findings 2024 · 39 citations
- Why Prompt Design Matters and Works: A Complexity Analysis of Prompt Search Space in LLMsXiang Zhang, Juntai Cao, Chenyu You, Dujian DingACL 2025 · 21 citations
