Critical Learning Periods Emerge Even in Deep Linear Networks
Michael Kleinman, Alessandro Achille, Stefano Soatto
Abstract
Critical learning periods are periods early in development where temporary sensory deficits can have a permanent effect on behavior and learned representations. Despite the radical differences between biological and artificial networks, critical learning periods have been empirically observed in both systems. This suggests that critical periods may be fundamental to learning and not an accident of biology. Yet, why exactly critical periods emerge in deep networks is still an open question, and in particular it is unclear whether the critical periods observed in both systems depend on particular architectural or optimization details. To isolate the key underlying factors, we focus on deep linear network models, and show that, surprisingly, such networks also display much of the behavior seen in biology and artificial networks, while being amenable to analytical treatment. We show that critical periods depend on the depth of the model and structure of the data distribution. We also show analytically and in simulations that the learning of features is tied to competition between sources. Finally, we extend our analysis to multi-task learning to show that pre-training on certain tasks can damage the transfer performance on new tasks, and show how this depends on the relationship between tasks and the duration of the pre-training stage. To the best of our knowledge, our work provides the first analytically tractable model that sheds light into why critical learning periods emerge in biological and artificial networks 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 13c6d838-d81b-4aac-9bba-488b4c5ded73Cited by top-tier papers4
- DASH: Warm-Starting Neural Network Training in Stationary Settings without Loss of PlasticityBaekrok Shin, Junsoo Oh, Hanseul Cho, Chulhee YunNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- Implicit Bias and Loss of Plasticity in Matrix Completion: Depth Promotes Low-RanknessBaekrok Shin, Chulhee YunICLR 2026
- Understanding the Learning Phases in Self-Supervised Learning via Critical PeriodsJanghyeon Lee, Philipe A. Dias, Yao-Yi Chiang, Dalton D. LungaICLR 2026
- Plastic Learning with Deep Fourier FeaturesAlex Lewandowski, Dale Schuurmans, Marlos C. MachadoICLR 2025
Builds on3
- The Neural Race Reduction: Dynamics of Abstraction in Gated NetworksAndrew M. Saxe, Shagun Sodhani, Sam Jay LewallenICML 2022 · 52 citations
- Learning dynamics of deep linear networks with multiple pathwaysJianghong Shi, Eric Shea-Brown, Michael A. BuiceNeurIPS 2022 · 10 citations
- Critical Learning Periods for Multisensory Integration in Deep NetworksMichael Kleinman, Alessandro Achille, Stefano SoattoCVPR 2023
Related papers
- An exactly solvable model for emergence and scaling laws in the multitask sparse parity problemYoonsoo Nam, Nayara Fonseca, Seok Hyeong Lee, Chris Mingard et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 20 citations
- Features are fate: a theory of transfer learning in high-dimensional regressionJavan Tahir, Surya Ganguli, Grant M. RotskoffICML 2025
- The Early Phase of Neural Network TrainingJonathan Frankle, David J. Schwab, Ari S. MorcosICLR 2020 · 199 citations
- Understanding Unimodal Bias in Multimodal Deep Linear NetworksYedi Zhang, Peter E. Latham, Andrew M. SaxeICML 2024 · 20 citations
- Nonlinear dynamics of localization in neural receptive fieldsLeon Lufkin, Andrew M. Saxe, Erin GrantNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
