Plastic Learning with Deep Fourier Features
Alex Lewandowski, Dale Schuurmans, Marlos C. Machado
Abstract
Deep neural networks can struggle to learn continually in the face of nonstationarity, a phenomenon known as loss of plasticity. In this paper, we identify underlying principles that lead to plastic algorithms. We provide theoretical results showing that linear function approximation, as well as a special case of deep linear networks, do not suffer from loss of plasticity. We then propose deep Fourier features, which are the concatenation of a sine and cosine in every layer, and we show that this combination provides a dynamic balance between the trainability obtained through linearity and the effectiveness obtained through the nonlinearity of neural networks. Deep networks composed entirely of deep Fourier features are highly trainable and sustain their trainability over the course of learning. Our empirical results show that continual learning performance can be improved by replacing ReLU activations with deep Fourier features combined with regularization. These results hold for different continual learning scenarios (e.g., label noise, class incremental learning, pixel permutations) on all major supervised learning datasets used for continual learning research, such as CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and tiny-ImageNet.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext efc0f7c2-b620-40d4-892f-01eed975da0fCited by top-tier papers4
- FIRE: Frobenius-Isometry Reinitialization for Balancing the Stability-Plasticity TradeoffIsaac Han, Sangyeon Park, Seungwon Oh, Donghu Kim et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Activation Function Design Sustains Plasticity in Continual LearningLute Lillo, Nick CheneyICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- The World Is Bigger! A Computationally-Embedded Perspective on the Big World HypothesisAlex Lewandowski, Adtiya A. Ramesh, Edan Meyer, Dale Schuurmans et al.NeurIPS 2025
- Activation by Interval-wise Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Plasticity LossSangyeon Park, Isaac Han, Seungwon Oh, Kyung-Joong KimICML 2025
Builds on18
- Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional DomainsMatthew Tancik, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Ben Mildenhall, Sara Fridovich-Keil et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 4,036 citations
- On Warm-Starting Neural Network TrainingJordan T. Ash, Ryan P. AdamsNeurIPS 2020 · 288 citations
- A Definition of Continual Reinforcement LearningDavid Abel, André Barreto, Benjamin Van Roy, Doina Precup et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 167 citations
- Understanding Plasticity in Neural NetworksClare Lyle, Zeyu Zheng, Evgenii Nikishin, Bernardo Ávila Pires et al.ICML 2023 · 162 citations
- The Dormant Neuron Phenomenon in Deep Reinforcement LearningGhada Sokar, Rishabh Agarwal, Pablo Samuel Castro, Utku EvciICML 2023 · 153 citations
Related papers
- Spectral Collapse Drives Loss of Plasticity in Deep Continual LearningArjun Prakash, Naicheng He, Kaicheng Guo, Saket Tiwari et al.ICML 2026
- Learning Continually by Spectral RegularizationAlex Lewandowski, Michal Bortkiewicz, Saurabh Kumar, András György et al.ICLR 2025
- Preserving Plasticity in Continual Learning via Dynamical IsometryAndries Rosseau, Robert Müller, Ann NoweICML 2026 · 1 citation
- A Study of Plasticity Loss in On-Policy Deep Reinforcement LearningArthur Juliani, Jordan T. AshNeurIPS 2024 · 37 citations
- The Dual Nature of Plasticity Loss in Deep Continual Learning: Dissection and MitigationHaoyu Wang, Wei Dai, Jiawei Zhang, Jialun Ma et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
