Communicating Activations Between Language Model Agents
Vignav Ramesh, Kenneth Li
Abstract
Communication between multiple language model (LM) agents has been shown to scale up the reasoning ability of LMs. While natural language has been the dominant medium for inter-LM communication, it is not obvious this should be the standard: not only does natural language communication incur high inference costs that scale quickly with the number of both agents and messages, but also the decoding process abstracts away too much rich information that could be otherwise accessed from the internal activations. In this work, we propose a simple technique whereby LMs communicate via activations; concretely, we pause an LM B's computation at an intermediate layer, combine its current activation with another LM A's intermediate activation via some function f , then pass f 's output into the next layer of B and continue the forward pass till decoding is complete. This approach scales up LMs on new tasks with zero additional parameters and data, and saves a substantial amount of compute over natural language communication. We test our method with various functional forms f on two experimental setups-multi-player coordination games and reasoning benchmarks-and find that it achieves up to 27.0% improvement over natural language communication across datasets with <1/4 the compute, illustrating the superiority and robustness of activations as an alternative "language" for communication between LMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 12ebd64f-1e75-42ab-9a67-c59edbaf0bf2Cited by top-tier papers4
- Enabling Agents to Communicate Entirely in Latent SpaceZhuoyun Du, Runze Wang, Huiyu Bai, Zouying Cao et al.ACL 2026 · 18 citations
- KVComm: Enabling Efficient LLM Communication through Selective KV SharingXiangyu Shi, Marco Chiesa, Gerald Q. Maguire Jr., Dejan KosticICLR 2026 · 18 citations
- Multi-Way Representation AlignmentAkshit Achara, Tatiana Gaintseva, Matéo Mahaut, Pritish Chakraborty et al.ICML 2026
- Augmenting Multi-Agent Communication with State Delta TrajectoryYichen Tang, Weihang Su, Yujia Zhou, Yiqun Liu et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on17
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent DebateYilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.ICML 2024 · 1,562 citations
- Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language ModelKenneth Li, Oam Patel, Fernanda B. Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,549 citations
Related papers
- Language Model Networks: Supervision-Efficient Learning through Dense CommunicationShiguang Wu, Yaqing Wang, QUANMING YAOICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Latent Collaboration in Multi-Agent SystemsJiaru Zou, Xiyuan Yang, Ruizhong Qiu, Gaotang Li et al.ICML 2026 · 42 citations
- Let Models Speak Ciphers: Multiagent Debate through EmbeddingsChau Pham, Boyi Liu, Yingxiang Yang, Zhengyu Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 36 citations
- Learning to Orchestrate Agents in Natural Language with the ConductorStefan Nielsen, Edoardo Cetin, Peter Schwendeman, Qi Sun et al.ICLR 2026 · 22 citations
- Thought Communication in Multiagent CollaborationYujia Zheng, Zhuokai Zhao, Zijian Li, Yaqi Xie et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 31 citations
