Let Models Speak Ciphers: Multiagent Debate through Embeddings
Chau Pham, Boyi Liu, Yingxiang Yang, Zhengyu Chen, Tianyi Liu, Jianbo Yuan, Bryan A. Plummer, Zhaoran Wang, Hongxia Yang
Abstract
Discussion and debate among Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained considerable attention due to their potential to enhance the reasoning ability of LLMs. Although natural language is an obvious choice for communication due to LLM's language understanding capability, the token sampling step needed when generating natural language poses a potential risk of information loss, as it uses only one token to represent the model's belief across the entire vocabulary. In this paper, we introduce a communication regime named CIPHER (Communicative Inter-Model Protocol Through Embedding Representation) to address this issue. Specifically, we remove the token sampling step from LLMs and let them communicate their beliefs across the vocabulary through the expectation of the raw transformer output embeddings. Remarkably, by deviating from natural language, CIPHER offers an advantage of encoding a broader spectrum of information without any modification to the model weights, outperforming the state-of-the-art LLM debate methods using natural language by 0.5 -5.0% across five reasoning tasks and multiple open-source LLMs of varying sizes. This showcases the superiority and robustness of embeddings as an alternative "language" for communication among LLMs. We anticipate that CIPHER will inspire further exploration for the design of interactions within LLM agent systems, offering a new direction that could significantly influence future developments in the field.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4ebe2aa0-edf9-405c-86b5-1c4fe01967beCited by top-tier papers16
- Multi-LLM Debate: Framework, Principals, and InterventionsAndrew Estornell, Yang LiuNeurIPS 2024 · 131 citations
- On scalable oversight with weak LLMs judging strong LLMsZachary Kenton, Noah Y. Siegel, János Kramár, Jonah Brown-Cohen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 116 citations
- Debate or Vote: Which Yields Better Decisions in Multi-Agent Large Language Models?Hyeong Kyu Choi, Xiaojin Zhu, Sharon LiNeurIPS 2025 · 93 citations
- Thought Communication in Multiagent CollaborationYujia Zheng, Zhuokai Zhao, Zijian Li, Yaqi Xie et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 31 citations
- Multi-Agent Debate for LLM Judges with Adaptive Stability DetectionTianyu Hu, Zhen Tan, Song Wang, Huaizhi Qu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 25 citations
Builds on13
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
Related papers
- Augmenting Multi-Agent Communication with State Delta TrajectoryYichen Tang, Weihang Su, Yujia Zhou, Yiqun Liu et al.EMNLP 2025
- Communicating Activations Between Language Model AgentsVignav Ramesh, Kenneth LiICML 2025
- MAD-Logic: Multi-Agent Debate Enhances Symbolic Translation and ReasoningHaocheng Yang, Fengxiang Cheng, Tianjun Yao, Mengyue Yang et al.ICLR 2026
- Latent Collaboration in Multi-Agent SystemsJiaru Zou, Xiyuan Yang, Ruizhong Qiu, Gaotang Li et al.ICML 2026 · 42 citations
- Cache-to-Cache: Direct Semantic Communication Between Large Language ModelsTianyu Fu, Zihan Min, Hanling Zhang, Jichao Yan et al.ICLR 2026 · 59 citations
