Collaborative Performance Prediction for Large Language Models
Qiyuan Zhang, Fuyuan Lyu, Xue Liu, Chen Ma
Abstract
Comprehensively understanding and accurately predicting the performance of large language models across diverse downstream tasks has emerged as a pivotal challenge in NLP research. The pioneering scaling law on downstream works (Hu et al., 2024; Isik et al., 2024) demonstrated intrinsic similarities within model families and utilized such similarities for performance prediction. However, they tend to overlook the similarities between model families and only consider design factors listed in the original scaling law. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a novel framework, Collaborative Performance Prediction (CPP), which significantly enhances prediction accuracy by leveraging the historical performance of various models on downstream tasks and other design factors for both model and task. We also collect a collaborative data sourced from online platforms containing both historical performance and additional design factors. With the support of the collaborative data, CPP not only surpasses traditional scaling laws in predicting the performance of scaled LLMs but also facilitates a detailed analysis of factor importance, an area previously overlooked. Our code is available here. © 2024 Association for Computational Linguistics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0f2364e2-33a3-49f7-bb8c-14a52f931647Cited by top-tier papers2
- Can We Predict Performance of Large Models across Vision-Language Tasks?Qinyu Zhao, Ming Xu, Kartik Gupta, Akshay Asthana et al.ICML 2025
- Capability Salience Vector: Fine-grained Alignment of Loss and Capabilities for Downstream Task Scaling LawQiming Ge, Shuhao Xing, Songyang Gao, Yunhua Zhou et al.ACL 2025
Builds on9
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?Rylan Schaeffer, Brando Miranda, Sanmi KoyejoNeurIPS 2023 · 796 citations
- An empirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model trainingJordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 566 citations
Related papers
- Unveiling Downstream Performance Scaling of LLMs: A Clustering-Based PerspectiveChengyin Xu, Kaiyuan Chen, Xiao Li, Ke Shen et al.ICLR 2026 · 11 citations
- Sloth: scaling laws for LLM skills to predict multi-benchmark performance across familiesFelipe Maia Polo, Seamus Somerstep, Leshem Choshen, Yuekai Sun et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 28 citations
- Revisiting the Scaling Properties of Downstream Metrics in Large Language Model TrainingJakub Krajewski, Amitis Shidani, Dan Busbridge, Sam Wiseman et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- A Hitchhiker's Guide to Scaling Law EstimationLeshem Choshen, Yang Zhang, Jacob AndreasICML 2025
- LLMs on the Line: Data Determines Loss-to-Loss Scaling LawsPrasanna Mayilvahanan, Thaddäus Wiedemer, Sayak Mallick, Matthias Bethge et al.ICML 2025
