Capability Salience Vector: Fine-grained Alignment of Loss and Capabilities for Downstream Task Scaling Law
Qiming Ge, Shuhao Xing, Songyang Gao, Yunhua Zhou, Yicheng Zou, Songyang Zhang, Zhi Chen, Hang Yan, Qi Zhang, Qipeng Guo, Kai Chen
Abstract
Scaling law builds the relationship between training computation and validation loss, enabling researchers to effectively predict the loss trending of models across different levels of computation. However, a gap still remains between validation loss and the model's downstream capabilities, making it untrivial to apply scaling law to direct performance prediction for downstream tasks. The loss typically represents a cumulative penalty for predicted tokens, which are implicitly considered to have equal importance. Nevertheless, our studies have shown evidence that when considering different training data distributions, we cannot directly model the relationship between downstream capability and computation or token loss. To bridge the gap between validation loss and downstream task capabilities, in this work, we introduce Capability Salience Vector, which decomposes the overall loss and assigns different importance weights to tokens to assess a specific meta-capability, aligning the validation loss with downstream task performance in terms of the model's capabilities. Experiments on various popular benchmarks demonstrate that our proposed Capability Salience Vector could significantly improve the predictability of language model performance on downstream tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on8
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Scaling Data-Constrained Language ModelsNiklas Muennighoff, Alexander M. Rush, Boaz Barak, Teven Le Scao et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 475 citations
- tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplesFelipe Maia Polo, Lucas Weber, Leshem Choshen, Yuekai Sun et al.ICML 2024 · 212 citations
- Understanding Emergent Abilities of Language Models from the Loss PerspectiveZhengxiao Du, Aohan Zeng, Yuxiao Dong, Jie TangNeurIPS 2024 · 113 citations
- Same Pre-training Loss, Better Downstream: Implicit Bias Matters for Language ModelsHong Liu, Sang Michael Xie, Zhiyuan Li, Tengyu MaICML 2023 · 82 citations
Related papers
- Revisiting the Scaling Properties of Downstream Metrics in Large Language Model TrainingJakub Krajewski, Amitis Shidani, Dan Busbridge, Sam Wiseman et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasksSamir Yitzhak Gadre, Georgios Smyrnis, Vaishaal Shankar, Suchin Gururangan et al.ICLR 2025 · 3 citations
- Why Has Predicting Downstream Capabilities of Frontier AI Models with Scale Remained Elusive?Rylan Schaeffer, Hailey Schoelkopf, Brando Miranda, Gabriel Mukobi et al.ICML 2025
- LLMs on the Line: Data Determines Loss-to-Loss Scaling LawsPrasanna Mayilvahanan, Thaddäus Wiedemer, Sayak Mallick, Matthias Bethge et al.ICML 2025
- Collaborative Performance Prediction for Large Language ModelsQiyuan Zhang, Fuyuan Lyu, Xue Liu, Chen MaEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
