Gradient Flow in Sparse Neural Networks and How Lottery Tickets Win
Utku Evci, Yani Ioannou, Cem Keskin, Yann N. Dauphin
Abstract
Sparse Neural Networks (NNs) can match the generalization of dense NNs using a fraction of the compute/storage for inference, and have the potential to enable efficient training. However, naively training unstructured sparse NNs from random initialization results in significantly worse generalization, with the notable exceptions of Lottery Tickets (LTs) and Dynamic Sparse Training (DST). Through our analysis of gradient flow during training we attempt to answer: (1) why training unstructured sparse networks from random initialization performs poorly and; (2) what makes LTs and DST the exceptions? We show that sparse NNs have poor gradient flow at initialization and demonstrate the importance of using sparsity-aware initialization. Furthermore, we find that DST methods significantly improve gradient flow during training over traditional sparse training methods. Finally, we show that LTs do not improve gradient flow, rather their success lies in re-learning the pruning solution they are derived fromhowever, this comes at the cost of learning novel solutions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0db3c686-9160-4a36-9406-29d7063a03a4Cited by top-tier papers30
- Do We Actually Need Dense Over-Parameterization? In-Time Over-Parameterization in Sparse TrainingShiwei Liu, Lu Yin, Decebal Constantin Mocanu, Mykola PechenizkiyICML 2021 · 146 citations
- The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Random Pruning: Return of the Most Naive Baseline for Sparse TrainingShiwei Liu, Tianlong Chen, Xiaohan Chen, Li Shen et al.ICLR 2022 · 141 citations
- GradMax: Growing Neural Networks using Gradient InformationUtku Evci, Bart van Merrienboer, Thomas Unterthiner, Fabian Pedregosa et al.ICLR 2022 · 72 citations
- The State of Sparse Training in Deep Reinforcement LearningLaura Graesser, Utku Evci, Erich Elsen, Pablo Samuel CastroICML 2022 · 65 citations
- Deep Ensembling with No Overhead for either Training or Testing: The All-Round Blessings of Dynamic SparsityShiwei Liu, Tianlong Chen, Zahra Atashgahi, Xiaohan Chen et al.ICLR 2022 · 62 citations
Builds on13
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 884 citations
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 743 citations
- Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets WinnersUtku Evci, Trevor Gale, Jacob Menick, Pablo Samuel Castro et al.ICML 2020 · 723 citations
- Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network PruningAlex Renda, Jonathan Frankle, Michael CarbinICLR 2020 · 437 citations
Related papers
- Why Random Pruning Is All We Need to Start SparseAdvait Harshal Gadhikar, Sohom Mukherjee, Rebekka BurkholzICML 2023 · 33 citations
- Dual Lottery Ticket HypothesisYue Bai, Huan Wang, Zhiqiang Tao, Kunpeng Li et al.ICLR 2022 · 49 citations
- Sign-In to the Lottery: Reparameterizing Sparse TrainingAdvait Gadhikar, Tom Jacobs, Chao Zhou, Rebekka BurkholzNeurIPS 2025
- Lottery Ticket Preserves Weight Correlation: Is It Desirable or Not?Ning Liu, Geng Yuan, Zhengping Che, Xuan Shen et al.ICML 2021 · 34 citations
- Lottery Tickets in Evolutionary Optimization: On Sparse Backpropagation-Free TrainabilityRobert Tjarko Lange, Henning SprekelerICML 2023 · 2 citations
