Reverse-Annealed Sequential Monte Carlo for Efficient Bayesian Optimal Experiment Design
Jake Callahan, Andrew Chin, Jason Pacheco, Tommie A. Catanach
Abstract
Expected information gain (EIG) is a crucial quantity in Bayesian optimal experimental design (BOED), quantifying how useful an experiment is by the amount we expect the posterior to differ from the prior. However, evaluating the EIG can be computationally expensive since it generally requires estimating the posterior normalizing constant. In this work, we leverage two idiosyncrasies of BOED to improve efficiency of EIG estimation via sequential Monte Carlo (SMC). First, in BOED we simulate the data and thus know the true underlying parameters. Second, we ultimately care about the EIG, not the individual normalizing constants. Often we observe that the Monte Carlo variance of standard SMC estimators for the normalizing constant of a single dataset are significantly lower than the variance of the normalizing constants across datasets; the latter thus contributes the majority of the variance for EIG estimates. This suggests the potential to slightly increase variance while drastically decreasing computation time by reducing the SMC population size, which leads us to an EIG-specific SMC estimator that starts with only a single sample from the posterior and tempers backwards towards the prior. Using this single-sample estimator, which we call reverse-annealed SMC (RA-SMC), we show that it is possible to estimate EIG with orders of magnitude fewer likelihood evaluations in three models: a four-dimensional spring-mass, a six-dimensional Johnson-Cook model and a four-dimensional source-finding problem.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0c8d8990-2aa1-4cde-aa06-d9af5e89d857Builds on4
- Deep Adaptive Design: Amortizing Sequential Bayesian Experimental DesignAdam Foster, Desi R. Ivanova, Ilyas Malik, Tom RainforthICML 2021 · 119 citations
- Bayesian Experimental Design for Implicit Models by Mutual Information Neural EstimationSteven Kleinegesse, Michael U. GutmannICML 2020 · 84 citations
- Implicit Deep Adaptive Design: Policy-Based Experimental Design without LikelihoodsDesi R. Ivanova, Adam Foster, Steven Kleinegesse, Michael U. Gutmann et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 81 citations
- Optimizing Sequential Experimental Design with Deep Reinforcement LearningTom Blau, Edwin V. Bonilla, Iadine Chades, Amir DezfouliICML 2022 · 62 citations
Related papers
- On Estimating the Gradient of the Expected Information Gain in Bayesian Experimental DesignZiqiao Ao, Jinglai LiAAAI 2024 · 4 citations
- PASOA- PArticle baSed Bayesian Optimal Adaptive designJacopo Iollo, Christophe Heinkelé, Pierre Alliez, Florence ForbesICML 2024 · 4 citations
- Bayesian Experimental Design Via Contrastive DiffusionsJacopo Iollo, Christophe Heinkelé, Pierre Alliez, Florence ForbesICLR 2025
- Tractable Expected Information Gains for Exponential Family PosteriorsRik Knowles, Tom RainforthICML 2026
- Design Amortization for Bayesian Optimal Experimental DesignNoble Kennamer, Steven Walton, Alexander IhlerAAAI 2023 · 7 citations
