On Estimating the Gradient of the Expected Information Gain in Bayesian Experimental Design
Ziqiao Ao, Jinglai Li
Abstract
Bayesian Experimental Design (BED), which aims to find the optimal experimental conditions for Bayesian inference, is usually posed as to optimize the expected information gain (EIG). The gradient information is often needed for efficient EIG optimization, and as a result the ability to estimate the gradient of EIG is essential for BED problems. The primary goal of this work is to develop methods for estimating the gradient of EIG, which, combined with the stochastic gradient descent algorithms, result in efficient optimization of EIG. Specifically, we first introduce a posterior expected representation of the EIG gradient with respect to the design variables. Based on this, we propose two methods for estimating the EIG gradient, UEEG-MCMC that leverages posterior samples generated through Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to estimate the EIG gradient, and BEEG-AP that focuses on achieving high simulation efficiency by repeatedly using parameter samples. Theoretical analysis and numerical studies illustrate that UEEG-MCMC is robust agains the actual EIG value, while BEEG-AP is more efficient when the EIG value to be optimized is small. Moreover, both methods show superior performance compared to several popular benchmarks in our numerical experiments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 30508a7c-d9f2-4473-96cf-d45043fe72baCited by top-tier papers4
- Tractable Expected Information Gains for Exponential Family PosteriorsRik Knowles, Tom RainforthICML 2026
- Bayesian Experimental Design Via Contrastive DiffusionsJacopo Iollo, Christophe Heinkelé, Pierre Alliez, Florence ForbesICLR 2025
- EARL-BO: Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Step Lookahead, High-Dimensional Bayesian OptimizationMujin Cheon, Jay H. Lee, Dong-Yeun Koh, Calvin TsayICML 2025
- DiffBED: Scaling Bayesian Experimental Design to High-DimensionsAdhi Saravanan, Rik Knowles, Gavin Kerrigan, Tom RainforthICLR 2026
Builds on3
- Understanding the Limitations of Variational Mutual Information EstimatorsJiaming Song, Stefano ErmonICLR 2020 · 243 citations
- Bayesian Experimental Design for Implicit Models by Mutual Information Neural EstimationSteven Kleinegesse, Michael U. GutmannICML 2020 · 84 citations
- AR-DAE: Towards Unbiased Neural Entropy Gradient EstimationJae Hyun Lim, Aaron C. Courville, Christopher J. Pal, Chin-Wei HuangICML 2020 · 26 citations
Related papers
- Reverse-Annealed Sequential Monte Carlo for Efficient Bayesian Optimal Experiment DesignJake Callahan, Andrew Chin, Jason Pacheco, Tommie A. CatanachNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Design Amortization for Bayesian Optimal Experimental DesignNoble Kennamer, Steven Walton, Alexander IhlerAAAI 2023 · 7 citations
- Online Bayesian Experimental Design for Partially Observed Dynamical SystemsSara Pérez-Vieites, Sahel Iqbal, Simo Särkkä, Dominik BaumannICML 2026
- PASOA- PArticle baSed Bayesian Optimal Adaptive designJacopo Iollo, Christophe Heinkelé, Pierre Alliez, Florence ForbesICML 2024 · 4 citations
- BED-LLM: Intelligent Information Gathering with LLMs and Bayesian Experimental DesignDeepro Choudhury, Sinead Williamson, Adam Golinski, Ning Miao et al.ICLR 2026 · 24 citations
