Implicit Deep Adaptive Design: Policy-Based Experimental Design without Likelihoods
Desi R. Ivanova, Adam Foster, Steven Kleinegesse, Michael U. Gutmann, Thomas Rainforth
Abstract
We introduce implicit Deep Adaptive Design (iDAD), a new method for performing adaptive experiments in real-time with implicit models. iDAD amortizes the cost of Bayesian optimal experimental design (BOED) by learning a design policy network upfront, which can then be deployed quickly at the time of the experiment. The iDAD network can be trained on any model which simulates differentiable samples, unlike previous design policy work that requires a closed form likelihood and conditionally independent experiments. At deployment, iDAD allows design decisions to be made in milliseconds, in contrast to traditional BOED approaches that require heavy computation during the experiment itself. We illustrate the applicability of iDAD on a number of experiments, and show that it provides a fast and effective mechanism for performing adaptive design with implicit models. Recently, Foster et al. [17] proposed an exciting alternative approach, called Deep Adaptive Design (DAD), that is based on learning design policies. DAD provides a way to avoid significant computation 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021). We also relax DAD's requirement for experiments to be conditionally independent, allowing its application in complex settings like time series data, and, through innovative architecture adaptations, also provide improvements in the conditionally independent setting as well. This further expands the model space for policy-based BOED, and leads to additional performance improvements. Critically, iDAD forms the first method in the literature that can practically perform real-time adaptive BOED with implicit models: previous approaches are either not fast enough to run in real-time for non-trivial models, or require explicit likelihood models. We illustrate the applicability of iDAD on a range of experimental design problems, highlighting its benefits over existing baselines, even finding that it often outperforms costly non-amortized approaches. Code for iDAD is publicly available at https://github.com/desi-ivanova/idad . Background The BOED framework [32] begins by specifying a Bayesian model of the experimental process, consisting of a prior on the unknown parameters p(θ), a set of controllable designs ξ, and a data generating process that depends on them y|θ, ξ; as usual in BOED, we assume that p(θ) does not depend on ξ. In this paper, we consider the situation where y|θ, ξ is specified implicitly. This means
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4f2f9647-adeb-445b-9540-502ed61345acCited by top-tier papers24
- Interventions, Where and How? Experimental Design for Causal Models at ScalePanagiotis Tigas, Yashas Annadani, Andrew Jesson, Bernhard Schölkopf et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 68 citations
- Optimizing Sequential Experimental Design with Deep Reinforcement LearningTom Blau, Edwin V. Bonilla, Iadine Chades, Amir DezfouliICML 2022 · 62 citations
- Tight Mutual Information Estimation With Contrastive Fenchel-Legendre OptimizationQing Guo, Junya Chen, Dong Wang, Yuewei Yang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 28 citations
- BED-LLM: Intelligent Information Gathering with LLMs and Bayesian Experimental DesignDeepro Choudhury, Sinead Williamson, Adam Golinski, Ning Miao et al.ICLR 2026 · 24 citations
- Amortized Bayesian Experimental Design for Decision-MakingDaolang Huang, Yujia Guo, Luigi Acerbi, Samuel KaskiNeurIPS 2024 · 24 citations
Builds on6
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Stabilizing Transformers for Reinforcement LearningEmilio Parisotto, H. Francis Song, Jack W. Rae, Razvan Pascanu et al.ICML 2020 · 464 citations
- Understanding the Limitations of Variational Mutual Information EstimatorsJiaming Song, Stefano ErmonICLR 2020 · 243 citations
- Deep Adaptive Design: Amortizing Sequential Bayesian Experimental DesignAdam Foster, Desi R. Ivanova, Ilyas Malik, Tom RainforthICML 2021 · 119 citations
- Bayesian Experimental Design for Implicit Models by Mutual Information Neural EstimationSteven Kleinegesse, Michael U. GutmannICML 2020 · 84 citations
Related papers
- Step-DAD: Semi-Amortized Policy-Based Bayesian Experimental DesignMarcel Hedman, Desi R. Ivanova, Cong Guan, Tom RainforthICML 2025
- Constrained Bayesian Experimental Design via Online PlanningYujia Guo, Daolang Huang, Xinyu Zhang, Sammie Katt et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- JADAI: Jointly Amortizing Adaptive Design and Bayesian InferenceNiels Bracher, Lars Kühmichel, Desi Ivanova, Xavier Intes et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Efficient Bayesian Experiment Design with Equivariant NetworksConor Igoe, Tejus Gupta, Jeff G. SchneiderNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- PABBO: Preferential Amortized Black-Box OptimizationXinyu Zhang, Daolang Huang, Samuel Kaski, Julien MartinelliICLR 2025
