Direct Density Ratio Optimization: A Statistically Consistent Approach to Aligning Large Language Models
Rei Higuchi, Taiji Suzuki
Abstract
Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is crucial for safe deployment, yet existing methods assume specific preference models like Bradley-Terry model. This assumption leads to statistical inconsistency, where more data doesn't guarantee convergence to true human preferences. To address this critical gap, we introduce a novel alignment method Direct Density Ratio Optimization (DDRO). DDRO directly estimates the density ratio between preferred and unpreferred output distributions, circumventing the need for explicit human preference modeling. We theoretically prove that DDRO is statistically consistent, ensuring convergence to the true preferred distribution as the data size grows, regardless of the underlying preference structure. Experiments demonstrate that DDRO achieves superior performance compared to existing methods on many major benchmarks. DDRO unlocks the potential for truly data-driven alignment, paving the way for more reliable and human-aligned LLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0b78d166-2ea4-4227-8ea3-52df14c28581Cited by top-tier papers4
- Preference Optimization by Estimating the Ratio of the Data DistributionYeongmin Kim, HeeSun Bae, Byeonghu Na, Il-Chul MoonNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Distillation of Large Language Models via Concrete Score MatchingYeongmin Kim, Donghyeok Shin, Mina Kang, Byeonghu Na et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- A Minimum Variance Path Principle for Accurate and Stable Score-Based Density Ratio EstimationWei Chen, Jiacheng Li, Shigui Li, Zhiqi Lin et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Towards Disentangled Preference Optimization Dynamics: Suppress the Loser, Preserve the WinnerWei Chen, Yubing Wu, Junmei Yang, Delu Zeng et al.ICML 2026
Builds on9
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
Related papers
- Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model AlignmentTeng Xiao, Yige Yuan, Huaisheng Zhu, Mingxiao Li et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 76 citations
- Doubly Robust Alignment for Large Language ModelsErhan Xu, Kai Ye, Hongyi Zhou, Luhan Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- What Matters in Data for DPO?Yu Pan, Zhongze Cai, Huaiyang Zhong, Guanting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Autoregressive Direct Preference OptimizationMasanari Oi, Mahiro Ukai, Masahiro Kaneko, Naoaki Okazaki et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Risk-aware Direct Preference Optimization under Nested Risk MeasureLijun Zhang, Lin Li, Yajie Qi, Huizhong Song et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
