Distillation of Large Language Models via Concrete Score Matching
Yeongmin Kim, Donghyeok Shin, Mina Kang, Byeonghu Na, Il-Chul Moon
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) deliver remarkable performance but are costly to deploy, motivating knowledge distillation (KD) for efficient inference. Existing KD objectives typically match student and teacher probabilities via softmax, which blurs valuable logit information. While direct logit distillation (DLD) mitigates softmax smoothing, it fails to account for logit shift invariance, thereby restricting the solution space. We propose Concrete Score Distillation (CSD), a discrete score-matching objective that overcomes both softmax-induced smoothing and restrictions on the optimal solution set. We resolve the training instability and quadratic complexity of discrete score-matching in autoregressive LLMs, and the resulting CSD objective aligns relative logit differences across all vocabulary pairs between student and teacher with flexible weighting. We provide both mode-seeking and mode-covering instances within our framework and evaluate CSD on task-agnostic instruction-following, task-specific, and general chat capability distillation using GPT-2-1.5B, OpenLLaMA-7B, and Gemma-7B-IT, Qwen2.5-7B-IT, and Gemma2-9B-IT teachers. Experiments show that CSD consistently surpasses recent KD objectives, achieves favorable fidelity–diversity trade-offs, and yields complementary gains when combined with on-policy techniques, demonstrating its scalability and effectiveness for LLM distillation. Code: https://github.com/aailab-kaist/CSD.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 406d4d1e-82d6-421f-8ee1-9627fe7a0b01Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on19
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
- Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated InstructionsYizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu et al.ACL 2023 · 540 citations
- Discrete Diffusion Modeling by Estimating the Ratios of the Data DistributionAaron Lou, Chenlin Meng, Stefano ErmonICML 2024 · 473 citations
- On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated MistakesRishabh Agarwal, Nino Vieillard, Yongchao Zhou, Piotr Stanczyk et al.ICLR 2024 · 311 citations
- Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP TasksYizhong Wang, Swaroop Mishra, Pegah Alipoormolabashi, Yeganeh Kordi et al.EMNLP 2022 · 238 citations
Related papers
- Hybrid Policy Distillation for LLMsWenhong Zhu, Ruobing Xie, Rui Wang, Pengfei LiuICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Adversarial Moment-Matching Distillation of Large Language ModelsChen JiaNeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- Membership and Memorization in LLM Knowledge DistillationZiqi Zhang, Ali Shahin Shamsabadi, Hanxiao Lu, Yifeng Cai et al.EMNLP 2025
- SelecTKD: Selective Token-Weighted Knowledge Distillation for LLMsHaiduo Huang, Jiangcheng Song, Yadong Zhang, Pengju RenCVPR 2026 · 18 citations
- In Good GRACES: Principled Teacher Selection for Knowledge DistillationAbhishek Panigrahi, Bingbin Liu, Sadhika Malladi, Sham M. Kakade et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
