FlowForge: Guiding the Creation of Multi-Agent Workflows with Design Space Visualization as a Thinking Scaffold
Pan Hao, Dongyeop Kang, Nicholas Hinds, Qianwen Wang
Abstract
Multi-agent workflows have become an effective strategy for tackling complicated tasks by decomposing them into multiple sub-tasks and assigning them to specialized agents. However, designing optimal workflows remains challenging due to the vast and intricate design space. Current practices rely heavily on the intuition and expertise of practitioners, often resulting in design fixation or an unstructured, time-consuming exploration of trial-and-error. To address these challenges, this work introduces FLOWFORGE, an interactive visualization tool to facilitate the creation of multi-agent workflow through i) a structured visual exploration of the design space and ii) in-situ guidance informed by established design patterns. Based on formative studies and literature review, FLOWFORGE organizes the workflow design process into three hierarchical levels (i.e., task planning, agent assignment, and agent optimization), ranging from abstract to concrete. This structured visual exploration enables users to seamlessly move from high-level planning to detailed design decisions and implementations, while comparing alternative solutions across multiple performance metrics. Additionally, drawing from established workflow design patterns, FLOWFORGE provides context-aware, in-situ suggestions at each level as users navigate the design space, enhancing the workflow creation process with practical guidance. Use cases and user studies demonstrate the usability and effectiveness of FLOWFORGE, while also yielding valuable insights into how practitioners explore design spaces and leverage guidance during workflow development.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on21
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent DebateYilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.ICML 2024 · 1,562 citations
- ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent DebateChi-Min Chan, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jianxuan Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 871 citations
- AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model PromptsTongshuang Wu, Michael Terry, Carrie Jun CaiCHI 2022 · 465 citations
Related papers
- Multi-Agent Design: Optimizing Agents with Better Prompts and TopologiesHan Zhou, Xingchen Wan, Ruoxi Sun, Hamid Palangi et al.ICLR 2026 · 127 citations
- FlowSearcher: Synthesizing Memory-Guided Agentic Workflows for Web Information SeekingKeyi Xiang, Zeyu Feng, Zhuoyi Lin, Yueming Lyu et al.ICLR 2026
- Flow: Modularized Agentic Workflow AutomationBoye Niu, Yiliao Song, Kai Lian, Yifan Shen et al.ICLR 2025
- CompositingVis: Exploring Interactions for Creating Composite Visualizations in Immersive EnvironmentsQian Zhu, Tao Lu, Shunan Guo, Xiaojuan Ma et al.IEEE VIS 2024 · 11 citations
- Virtual Minds, Real Work: LLM-Powered Preference-Based Planning through Spatial Multi-Agent-Human CollaborationZiyi Zhang, Xin Yi, Zitong Dai, Xuewen Yu et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
