USENIX Security2025Top-tier venue
TwinBreak: Jailbreaking LLM Security Alignments based on Twin Prompts
Torsten Krauß, Hamid Dashtbani, Alexandra Dmitrienko
Abstract
Machine learning is advancing rapidly, with applications bringing notable benefits, such as improvements in translation and code generation. Models like ChatGPT, powered by Large Language Models (LLMs), are increasingly integrated into daily life. However, alongside these benefits, LLMs also introduce social risks. Malicious users can exploit LLMs by submitting harmful prompts, such as requesting instructions for illegal activities. To mitigate this, models often include a security mechanism that automatically rejects such harmful prompts. However, they can be bypassed through LLM jailbreaks. Current jailbreaks often require significant manual effort, high computational costs, or result in excessive model modifications that may degrade regular utility. We introduce TwinBreak, an innovative safety alignment removal method. Building on the idea that the safety mechanism operates like an embedded backdoor, TwinBreak identifies and prunes parameters responsible for this functionality. By focusing on the most relevant model layers, TwinBreak performs fine-grained analysis of parameters essential to model utility and safety. TwinBreak is the first method to analyze intermediate outputs from prompts with high structural and content similarity to isolate safety parameters. We present the TwinPrompt dataset containing 100 such twin prompts. Experiments confirm TwinBreak's effectiveness, achieving 89% to 98% success rates with minimal computational requirements across 16 LLMs from five vendors.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- GateBreaker: Gate-Guided Attacks on Mixture-of-Expert LLMsLichao Wu, Sasha Behrouzi, Mohamadreza Rostami, Stjepan Picek et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 14 citations
- GoodVibe: Security-by-Vibe for LLM-Based Code GenerationMaximilian Thang, Lichao Wu, Sasha Behrouzi, Mohamadreza Rostami et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 6 citations
- Bleeding Pathways: Vanishing Discriminability in LLM Hidden States Fuels Jailbreak AttacksYingjie Zhang, Tong Liu, Zhe Zhao, Guozhu Meng et al.NDSS 2026 · 5 citations
- A Causal Perspective for Enhancing Jailbreak Attack and DefenseLicheng Pan, Yunsheng Lu, Jiexi Liu, Jialing Tao et al.NDSS 2026
Builds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- Neural Cleanse: Identifying and Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Neural NetworksBolun Wang, Yuanshun Yao, Shawn Shan, Huiying Li et al.S&P 2019 · 1,801 citations
- Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single DirectionAndy Arditi, Oscar Obeso, Aaquib Syed, Daniel Paleka et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1,166 citations
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
Related papers
- Attack via Overfitting: 10-shot Benign Fine-tuning to Jailbreak LLMsZhixin Xie, Xurui Song, Jun LuoNeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Large Language Models Are Involuntary Truth-Tellers: Exploiting Fallacy Failure for Jailbreak AttacksYue Zhou, Henry Peng Zou, Barbara Di Eugenio, Yang ZhangEMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- Odysseus: Jailbreaking Commercial Multimodal LLM-integrated Systems via Dual SteganographySongze Li, Jiameng Cheng, Yiming Li, Xiaojun Jia et al.NDSS 2026 · 9 citations
- JULI: Jailbreak Large Language Models by Self-IntrospectionZhixian Wang, Zhanhao Hu, David A. WagnerICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- MetaBreak: Jailbreaking Online LLM Services via Special Token ManipulationWentian Zhu, Zhen Xiang, Wei Niu, Le GuanS&P 2026 · 2 citations
