USENIX Security2026Top-tier venue
GateBreaker: Gate-Guided Attacks on Mixture-of-Expert LLMs
Lichao Wu, Sasha Behrouzi, Mohamadreza Rostami, Stjepan Picek, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi
Abstract
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures have advanced the scaling of Large Language Models (LLMs) by activating only a sparse subset of parameters per input, enabling state-of-the-art performance with reduced computational cost. As these models are increasingly deployed in critical domains, understanding and strengthening their alignment mechanisms is essential to prevent harmful outputs. However, existing LLM safety research has focused almost exclusively on dense architectures, leaving the unique safety properties of MoEs largely unexamined. The modular, sparsely-activated design of MoEs suggests that safety mechanisms may operate differently than in dense models, raising questions about their robustness. In this paper, we present GateBreaker, the first training-free, lightweight, and architecture-agnostic attack framework that compromises the safety alignment of modern MoE LLMs at inference time. GateBreaker operates in three stages: (i) gate-level profiling , which identifies safety experts disproportionately routed on harmful inputs, (ii) expert-level localization , which localizes the safety structure within safety experts, and (iii) targeted safety removal , which disables the identified safety structure to compromise the safety alignment. Our study shows that MoE safety concentrates within a small subset of neurons coordinated by sparse routing. Selective disabling of these neurons, maximum 2.9% of neurons in the targeted expert layers, significantly increases the averaged attack success rate (ASR) from 7.4% to 64.9% against the eight latest aligned MoE LLMs with limited utility degradation. These safety neurons transfer across models within the same family, raising ASR from 17.9% to 67.7% with one-shot transfer attack. Furthermore, GateBreaker generalizes to five MoE vision language models (VLMs) with 60.9% ASR on unsafe image inputs. To our knowledge, no prior work achieves this level of efficacy against MoE LLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 122c8ce0-b1b6-4250-9b3c-000e52a3c308Cited by top-tier papers2
- GoodVibe: Security-by-Vibe for LLM-Based Code GenerationMaximilian Thang, Lichao Wu, Sasha Behrouzi, Mohamadreza Rostami et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 6 citations
- SEAL: Reinforcing Global Safety in Mixture-of-Experts through Shared Expert ALignmentQingyu Meng, Yiwei Zha, Jiahuan Pei, Koen Hindriks et al.CCS 2026
Builds on21
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 2,230 citations
Related papers
- MESA: Improving MoE Safety Alignment via Decentralized ExpertiseYitong Sun, Yao Huang, Teng Li, Ranjie Duan et al.ICML 2026
- Sparse Models, Sparse Safety: Unsafe Routes in Mixture-of-Experts LLMsYukun Jiang, Hai Huang, Mingjie Li, Yage Zhang et al.ICML 2026 · 9 citations
- SafeMoE: Safe Fine-Tuning for MoE LLMs by Aligning Harmful Input RoutingJaehan Kim, Minkyoo Song, Seungwon Shin, Sooel SonICLR 2026
- Who Speaks for the Trigger? Dynamic Expert Routing in Backdoored Mixture-of-Experts TransformersXin Zhao, Xiaojun Chen, Bingshan Liu, Haoyu Gao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- SAFEx: Analyzing Vulnerabilities of MoE-Based LLMs via Stable Safety-critical Expert IdentificationZhenglin Lai, Mengyao Liao, Bingzhe Wu, Dong Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 22 citations
