SEAL: Reinforcing Global Safety in Mixture-of-Experts through Shared Expert ALignment
Qingyu Meng, Yiwei Zha, Jiahuan Pei, Koen Hindriks, Herbert Bos, Min Chen
Abstract
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) is a scaling architecture for large language models that activates only a small subset of expert modules per token, enabling massive parameter growth with nearly constant computation. Recent Hybrid MoE architecture adds shared experts to capture consistently useful representations, further improving stability and generalization. MoE now powers many flagship opensource and commercial models, yet remains vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Specifically, sparse routing introduces a structural vulnerability: MoE safety hinges on which experts are activated, and adversaries can subvert this selection through jailbreak prompts, malicious fine-tuning, and weight-level pruning of safety-critical neurons. Existing defenses primarily focus on hardening the router, but an adversary may still manipulate or bypass the routing trajectory due to the routing process's nondeterministic nature, thereby collapsing the defense.
To cope with this problem, we first identify theoretically and empirically that shared expert, an always-activated component containing a small proportion of safety-critical neurons, can overcome the uncertainty of sparsely activated routing path and serve as a router-independent anchor to enhance global safety alignment. Based on this insight, we propose SEAL, a training-time parameterefficient defense that produces a plug-and-play adapter attached to shared expert, and SEAL++, a variant that adds an orthogonal constraint preserving pre-existing safety subspaces during training. We evaluate SEAL and SEAL++ across six attack scenarios that combine three adversarial inputs (harmful prompting, jailbreak, malicious fine-tuning) with and without neuron pruning. SEAL reduces attack success rate (ASR) by up to 60%, at a capability cost of at most 1.4% on a five-benchmark average. Additionally, SEAL can seamlessly integrate with router-level defenses for stronger defense. Under this setting, we can further decrease the ASR to 4.8%, more than five times lower than router-level defense alone. More broadly, our work demonstrates that shared experts constitute a unique defense surface overlooked by prior work, offering a complementary safety alignment pathway.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on32
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 2,230 citations
Related papers
- SafeMoE: Safe Fine-Tuning for MoE LLMs by Aligning Harmful Input RoutingJaehan Kim, Minkyoo Song, Seungwon Shin, Sooel SonICLR 2026
- GateBreaker: Gate-Guided Attacks on Mixture-of-Expert LLMsLichao Wu, Sasha Behrouzi, Mohamadreza Rostami, Stjepan Picek et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 14 citations
- MESA: Improving MoE Safety Alignment via Decentralized ExpertiseYitong Sun, Yao Huang, Teng Li, Ranjie Duan et al.ICML 2026
- Sparse Models, Sparse Safety: Unsafe Routes in Mixture-of-Experts LLMsYukun Jiang, Hai Huang, Mingjie Li, Yage Zhang et al.ICML 2026 · 9 citations
- Who Speaks for the Trigger? Dynamic Expert Routing in Backdoored Mixture-of-Experts TransformersXin Zhao, Xiaojun Chen, Bingshan Liu, Haoyu Gao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
