A Causal Perspective for Enhancing Jailbreak Attack and Defense
Licheng Pan, Yunsheng Lu, Jiexi Liu, Jialing Tao, Haozhe Feng, Hui Xue, Zhixuan Chu, Kui Ren
Abstract
Uncovering the mechanisms behind "jailbreaks" in large language models (LLMs) is crucial for enhancing their safety and reliability, yet these mechanisms remain poorly understood. Existing studies predominantly analyze jailbreak prompts by probing latent representations, often overlooking the causal relationships between interpretable prompt features and jailbreak occurrences. In this work, we propose Causal Analyst, a framework that integrates LLMs into data-driven causal discovery to identify the direct causes of jailbreaks and leverage them for both attack and defense. We introduce a comprehensive dataset comprising 35k jailbreak attempts across seven LLMs, systematically constructed from 100 attack templates and 50 harmful queries, annotated with 37 meticulously designed human-readable prompt features. By jointly training LLM-based prompt encoding and GNN-based causal graph learning, we reconstruct causal pathways linking prompt features to jailbreak responses. Our analysis reveals that specific features, such as "Positive Character" and "Number of Task Steps", act as direct causal drivers of jailbreaks. We demonstrate the practical utility of these insights through two applications: ❶ a Jailbreaking Enhancer that targets identified causal features to significantly boost attack success rates on public benchmarks, and ❷ a Guardrail Advisor that utilizes the learned causal graph to extract true malicious intent from obfuscated queries. Extensive experiments, including baseline comparisons and causal structure validation, confirm the robustness of our causal analysis and its superiority over non-causal approaches. Our results suggest that analyzing jailbreak features from a causal perspective is an effective and interpretable approach for improving LLM reliability. Our code is available at https://github.com/Master-PLC/Causal-Analyst . Warning: Some contents may include disturbing contents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 437bc41f-8f44-4214-8483-08d09b052c02Builds on11
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting GenerationYangsibo Huang, Samyak Gupta, Mengzhou Xia, Kai Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 481 citations
- Synthetic Lies: Understanding AI-Generated Misinformation and Evaluating Algorithmic and Human SolutionsJiawei Zhou, Yixuan Zhang, Qianni Luo, Andrea G. Parker et al.CHI 2023 · 283 citations
- COLD-Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs with Stealthiness and ControllabilityXingang Guo, Fangxu Yu, Huan Zhang, Lianhui Qin et al.ICML 2024 · 173 citations
Related papers
- GraphShield: Graph-Theoretic Modeling of Network-Level Dynamics for Robust Jailbreak DetectionSunghee Dong, Sungwon Yi, Kangmin Bae, Jaeyoon Kim et al.ICLR 2026
- "Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language ModelsXinyue Shen, Zeyuan Chen, Michael Backes, Yun Shen et al.CCS 2024 · 132 citations
- Stand on The Shoulders of Giants: Building JailExpert from Previous Attack ExperienceXi Wang, Songlei Jian, Shasha Li, Xiaopeng Li et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Dual Intention Escape: Penetrating and Toxic Jailbreak Attack against Large Language ModelsYanni Xue, Jiakai Wang, Zixin Yin, Yuqing Ma et al.WWW 2025 · 5 citations
- JailbreakScope: Interpreting Jailbreak Mechanism through Representation and Circuit AnalysesZeqing He, Zhibo Wang, Zhixuan Chu, Huiyu Xu et al.USENIX Security 2026
