Portable Reward Tuning: Towards Reusable Fine-Tuning across Different Pretrained Models
Daiki Chijiwa, Taku Hasegawa, Kyosuke Nishida, Kuniko Saito, Susumu Takeuchi
Abstract
While foundation models have been exploited for various expert tasks through fine-tuning, any foundation model will become outdated due to its old knowledge or limited capability. Thus the underlying foundation model should be eventually replaced by new ones, which leads to repeated cost of fine-tuning these new models. Existing work addresses this problem by inference-time tuning, i.e., modifying the output probabilities from the new foundation model with the outputs from the old foundation model and its fine-tuned model, which involves an additional overhead in inference by the latter two models. In this paper, we propose a new fine-tuning principle, Portable Reward Tuning (PRT), that reduces the inference overhead by its nature, based on the reformulation of fine-tuning as the reward maximization. Specifically, instead of fine-tuning parameters of the foundation models, PRT trains the reward model explicitly through the same loss function as in fine-tuning. During inference, the reward model can be used with any foundation model (with the same set of vocabularies or labels) through the formulation of reward maximization. Experimental results, covering both vision and language models, demonstrate that the PRT-trained model can achieve comparable accuracy to the existing work of inference-time tuning, with less inference cost.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 076451de-4b31-4b98-8a24-4a76604b7f7aBuilds on23
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
Related papers
- ProxyThinker: Test-Time Guidance through Small Visual ReasonersZilin Xiao, Jaywon Koo, Siru Ouyang, Jefferson Hernandez et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Provable Benefits of RLVR over SFT for Reasoning Models: Learning to Backtrack EfficientlyStanley Wei, Juno KimICML 2026
- Fine-tuning Reinforcement Learning Models is Secretly a Forgetting Mitigation ProblemMaciej Wolczyk, Bartlomiej Cupial, Mateusz Ostaszewski, Michal Bortkiewicz et al.ICML 2024 · 29 citations
- Breaking Barriers: Do Reinforcement Post Training Gains Transfer To Unseen Domains?Chuxuan Hu, Yuxuan Zhu, Antony Kellermann, Caleb Biddulph et al.ICLR 2026
- Proximal Supervised Fine-TuningWenhong Zhu, Ruobing Xie, Rui Wang, Xingwu Sun et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
