Proximal Supervised Fine-Tuning
Wenhong Zhu, Ruobing Xie, Rui Wang, Xingwu Sun, Di Wang, Pengfei Liu
Abstract
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) of foundation models often leads to poor generalization, where prior capabilities deteriorate after tuning on specific tasks. Inspired by trust-region policy optimization (TRPO) and proximal policy optimization (PPO) in reinforcement learning (RL), we propose Proximal SFT (PSFT), a fine-tuning objective that incorporates the benefits of trust-region, effectively constraining policy drift during SFT while maintaining competitive tuning. By viewing SFT as a special case of policy gradient methods with constant positive advantages, we derive PSFT that stabilizes optimization and leads to generalization, while leaving room for further optimization in subsequent post-training stages. Experiments across mathematical, human-value, and multimodal domains show that PSFT matches standard SFT in-domain, outperforms it in out-of-domain generalization, remains stable under prolonged training without causing entropy collapse, and provides a stronger foundation for the subsequent optimization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext caa3ed95-ce57-4399-8680-ac549cfee6a3Cited by top-tier papers8
- Beyond Log Likelihood: Probability-Based Objectives for Supervised Fine-Tuning across the Model Capability ContinuumGaotang Li, Ruizhong Qiu, Xiusi Chen, Heng Ji et al.ICML 2026 · 15 citations
- Anchored Supervised Fine-TuningHe Zhu, Junyou Su, Peng Lai, Ren Ma et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
- Good SFT Optimizes for SFT, Better SFT Prepares for Reinforcement LearningDylan Zhang, Yufeng Xu, Haojin Wang, Qingzhi Chen et al.ICML 2026 · 8 citations
- Learning While Staying Curious: Entropy-Preserving Supervised Fine-Tuning via Adaptive Self-Distillation for Large Reasoning ModelsHao Wang, Hao Gu, Hongming Piao, Kaixiong Gong et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Hybrid Policy Distillation for LLMsWenhong Zhu, Ruobing Xie, Rui Wang, Pengfei LiuICML 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on19
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM ReasoningShenzhi Wang, Le Yu, Chang Gao, Chujie Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 592 citations
Related papers
- Polychromic Objectives for Reinforcement LearningJubayer Ibn Hamid, Ifdita Hasan Orney, Ellen Xu, Chelsea Finn et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Simple Policy OptimizationZhengpeng Xie, Qiang Zhang, Fan Yang, Marco Hutter et al.ICML 2025
- No Representation, No Trust: Connecting Representation, Collapse, and Trust Issues in PPOSkander Moalla, Andrea Miele, Daniil Pyatko, Razvan Pascanu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 35 citations
- Trust-Region Adaptive Policy OptimizationMingyu Su, Jian Guan, Yuxian Gu, Minlie Huang et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement LearningPenghui Qi, Xiangxin Zhou, Zichen Liu, Tianyu Pang et al.ICML 2026 · 22 citations
