AI is Entering Regulated Territory: Understanding the Supervisors' Perspective for Model Justifiability in Financial Crime Detection
Astrid Bertrand, James R. Eagan, Winston Maxwell, Joshua Brand
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to bring significant benefits to highly regulated industries such as healthcare or banking. Adoption, however, remains low. AI’s entry into complex socio-techno-legal systems raises issues of transparency, specifically for regulators. However, the perspective of supervisors, regulators who monitor compliance with applicable financial regulations, has rarely been studied. This paper focuses on understanding the needs of supervisors in anti-money laundering (AML) to better inform the design of AI justifications and explanations in highly regulated fields. Through scenario-based workshops with 13 supervisors and 6 banking professionals, we outline the auditing practices and socio-technical context of the supervisor. By combining the workshops’ insights with an analysis of compliance requirements, we identify the AML obligations that conflict with AI opacity. We then formulate seven needs that supervisors have for model justifiability. We discuss the role of explanations as reliable evidence on which to base justifications.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0762e803-2cd5-4f67-9ec0-aff52a0c4a14Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User ExperiencesQ. Vera Liao, Daniel M. Gruen, Sarah MillerCHI 2020 · 758 citations
- Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemsUpol Ehsan, Q. Vera Liao, Michael J. Muller, Mark O. Riedl et al.CHI 2021 · 505 citations
- "Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI InteractionSunnie S. Y. Kim, Elizabeth Anne Watkins, Olga Russakovsky, Ruth Fong et al.CHI 2023 · 178 citations
- Beyond Expertise and Roles: A Framework to Characterize the Stakeholders of Interpretable Machine Learning and their NeedsHarini Suresh, Steven R. Gomez, Kevin K. Nam, Arvind SatyanarayanCHI 2021 · 115 citations
- Don't Just Tell Me, Ask Me: AI Systems that Intelligently Frame Explanations as Questions Improve Human Logical Discernment Accuracy over Causal AI explanationsValdemar Danry, Pat Pataranutaporn, Yaoli Mao, Pattie MaesCHI 2023 · 108 citations
Related papers
- An Exploratory Study of Sociotechnical Issues for Anti-Money Laundering WorkersJordan D. Pyper, Jason WieseCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Unfooling Perturbation-Based Post Hoc ExplainersZachariah Carmichael, Walter J. ScheirerAAAI 2023 · 18 citations
- Evaluating the Impact of Explainable AI on Trust in AI-Assisted Code ReviewZhenhan Gao, Marvin Muñoz Barón, Umm-e Habiba, Daniel Graziotin et al.ISSTA 2026
- Rethinking the Role of AI with Physicians in Oncology: Revealing Perspectives from Clinical and Research WorkflowsHimanshu Verma, Jakub Mlynár, Roger Schaer, Julien Reichenbach et al.CHI 2023 · 55 citations
- "It just requires so much more creativity": Barriers and Workarounds to Gathering Information for AI ContestationSohini Upadhyay, Dasha Pruss, Alicia DeVrio, Krzysztof Z. Gajos et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
