Reimagining Legal Fact Verification with GenAI: Toward Effective Human-AI Collaboration
Sirui Han, Yuyao Zhang, Yidan Huang, Xueyan Li, Chengzhong Liu, Yike Guo
Abstract
Fact verification is a critical yet underexplored component of non-litigation legal practice. While existing research has examined automation in legal workflow and human-AI collaboration in high-stakes domains, little is known about how GenAI can support fact verification, a task that demands prudent judgment and strict accountability. To address this, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 lawyers to understand their current verification practices, attitudes toward GenAI adoption, and expectations for future systems. We found that while lawyers use GenAI for low-risk tasks like drafting and language optimization, concerns over accuracy, confidentiality, and liability are currently limiting its adoption for fact verification. These concerns translate into core design requirements for AI systems that are trustworthy and accountable. Based on these, we contribute design insights for human-AI collaboration in legal fact verification, emphasizing the development of auditable systems that balance efficiency with professional judgment and uphold ethical and legal accountability in high-stakes practice.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 11e39733-a153-4b6d-b4ec-050d2c0a561aBuilds on8
- Synthetic Disinformation Attacks on Automated Fact Verification SystemsYibing Du, Antoine Bosselut, Christopher D. ManningAAAI 2022 · 58 citations
- An Uncommon Task: Participatory Design in Legal AIFernando A. Delgado, Solon Barocas, Karen LevyCSCW 2022 · 38 citations
- Contextualizing User Perceptions about Biases for Human-Centered Explainable Artificial IntelligenceTina Chien-Wen Yuan, Nanyi Bi, Ya-Fang Lin, Yuen-Hsien TsengCHI 2023 · 30 citations
- Star-Agents: Automatic Data Optimization with LLM Agents for Instruction TuningHang Zhou, Yehui Tang, Haochen Qin, Yujie Yang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
- LegalWriter: An Intelligent Writing Support System for Structured and Persuasive Legal Case Writing for Novice Law StudentsFlorian Weber, Thiemo Wambsganss, Seyed Parsa Neshaei, Matthias SöllnerCHI 2024 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Attorneys and AI: How Lawyers Use Artificial Intelligence and Analyze Its ImpactsEddie A. Gomez Schieber, Nathaniel Kite, Matthew I. Hall, Christian Turner et al.CSCW 2025 · 1 citation
- I'm Always a Little Skeptical of It: Verification Practices of Blind Users When Working with Generative AI in SpreadsheetsMinoli Perera, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Cagatay Goncu, Kim MarriottCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Breaking News or Breaking Trust? Exploring Challenges and a Design Space for Trustworthy LLM Integration in JournalismTine Rønning Pedersen, Klara Øvlisen, Luke Connelly, Ira Assent et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge WorkersHao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Advait Sarkar, Lev Tankelevitch, Ian Drosos et al.CHI 2025 · 690 citations
- Exploring Design Practice with Generative AI: Perspectives from AEC Design ProfessionalsYue Xu, Yi Wang, Weiyue Gao, Yichen Chai et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
