Emergence of Sparse Representations from Noise
Trenton Bricken, Rylan Schaeffer, Bruno A. Olshausen, Gabriel Kreiman
Abstract
A hallmark of biological neural networks, which distinguishes them from their artificial counterparts, is the high degree of sparsity in their activations. This discrepancy raises three questions our work helps to answer: (i) Why are biological networks so sparse? (ii) What are the benefits of this sparsity? (iii) How can these benefits be utilized by deep learning models? Our answers to all of these questions center around training networks to handle random noise. Surprisingly, we discover that noisy training introduces three implicit loss terms that result in sparsely firing neurons specializing to high variance features of the dataset. When trained to reconstruct noisy-CIFAR10, neurons learn biological receptive fields. More broadly, noisy training presents a new approach to potentially increase model interpretability with additional benefits to robustness and computational efficiency.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Brain-like Variational InferenceHadi Vafaii, Dekel Galor, Jacob L. YatesNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- On the Relationship Between Activation Outliers and Feature Death in Sparse AutoencodersElana Simon, Etowah Adams, James ZouICML 2026
- Emergence and Effectiveness of Task Vectors in In-Context Learning: An Encoder Decoder PerspectiveSeungwook Han, Jinyeop Song, Jeff Gore, Pulkit AgrawalICML 2025
- Bilinear MLPs enable weight-based mechanistic interpretabilityMichael T. Pearce, Thomas Dooms, Alice Rigg, José Oramas et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on8
- On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example DefensesFlorian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Wieland Brendel, Aleksander MadryNeurIPS 2020 · 1,026 citations
- Explicit Regularisation in Gaussian Noise InjectionsAlexander Camuto, Matthew Willetts, Umut Simsekli, Stephen J. Roberts et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 90 citations
- SGD with Large Step Sizes Learns Sparse FeaturesMaksym Andriushchenko, Aditya Vardhan Varre, Loucas Pillaud-Vivien, Nicolas FlammarionICML 2023 · 77 citations
- Powerpropagation: A sparsity inducing weight reparameterisationJonathan Schwarz, Siddhant M. Jayakumar, Razvan Pascanu, Peter E. Latham et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 63 citations
- On Implicit Regularization in β-VAEsAbhishek Kumar, Ben PooleICML 2020 · 59 citations
Related papers
- Nonlinear dynamics of localization in neural receptive fieldsLeon Lufkin, Andrew M. Saxe, Erin GrantNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
- Revisiting Sparse Convolutional Model for Visual RecognitionXili Dai, Mingyang Li, Pengyuan Zhai, Shengbang Tong et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 45 citations
- Finding trainable sparse networks through Neural Tangent TransferTianlin Liu, Friedemann ZenkeICML 2020 · 40 citations
- Neural Sparse Representation for Image RestorationYuchen Fan, Jiahui Yu, Yiqun Mei, Yulun Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 39 citations
- The computational and learning benefits of Daleian neural networksAdam Haber, Elad SchneidmanNeurIPS 2022 · 10 citations
